Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
Amin Naemi1, Thomas Schmidt2, Marjan Mansourvar2
1Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, Center for Health Informatics and Technology,University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark amin@mmmi.sdu.dk.
Machine learning (ML) models show promise for predicting in-hospital mortality in emergency departments (EDs) using vital signs. However, many studies have a high risk of bias and lack crucial details, limiting practical application.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Prediction Models
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly explored for predicting patient outcomes.
- In-hospital mortality prediction in emergency departments (EDs) using vital signs is critical for timely intervention.
- Existing systematic reviews may not fully capture the performance and feasibility of these ML models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the performance and clinical feasibility of ML algorithms for predicting in-hospital mortality in medical patients.
- To identify the types of ML models used and their reported performance metrics.
- To assess the quality and identify research gaps in studies predicting in-hospital mortality using vital signs in the ED.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase) from 2010 to 2021.
- Included studies focused on ML models utilizing vital signs to predict in-hospital mortality for ED-admitted patients.
- Risk of bias was assessed using the prediction risk of bias assessment tool; critical appraisal followed standard checklists.
Main Results:
- Fifteen articles were included, evaluating eight different ML models (e.g., logistic regression, random forest, deep neural networks).
- Most studies exhibited a high risk of bias, particularly in statistical analysis, and often omitted details on data preprocessing and handling missing values.
- Nine articles lacked a specified time horizon for mortality prediction, impacting model interpretability.
Conclusions:
- The current body of research on ML for in-hospital mortality prediction in EDs has significant limitations, including high risk of bias and methodological inconsistencies.
- Eight recommendations are proposed to enhance the robustness and practical feasibility of ML models in clinical settings.
- Future research should focus on addressing identified gaps to develop reliable ML tools for early detection of patient deterioration.
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...

