Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
Published on: September 27, 2024
Study on Binocular Accommodative Function in Children With Different Types of Intermittent Exotropia
Dan Li1, Kun-Ling Li1, Jing Wang1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Insights
Children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) show differences in accommodative amplitude and function between their eyes. Their overall binocular accommodative function is reduced compared to non-strabismic children, varying by IXT type.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Pediatric Optometry
- Vision Science
Background:
- Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is a common childhood strabismus.
- Understanding accommodative function in IXT is crucial for effective management.
- Previous research has not fully elucidated differences in accommodation based on IXT subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate monocular and binocular accommodative amplitude (AMP) and accommodative function (AF) in children with different types of IXT.
- To compare accommodative parameters between fixing and non-fixing eyes in children with IXT.
- To compare accommodative parameters between different IXT subtypes and a control group.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 40 children diagnosed with IXT was studied.
- Monocular and binocular AMP and AF were measured using the modified approach and ±2D flip methods.
- Data were analyzed to compare differences between fixing/non-fixing eyes and between IXT groups and controls.
Main Results:
- Fixing eyes in children with IXT had lower AMP (p=0.007) and higher AF (p<0.001) than non-fixing eyes.
- All IXT groups exhibited lower AMPs than the control group.
- Children with convergence insufficiency had the lowest AMP and AF compared to other IXT types and controls (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
- Significant differences exist in accommodation between fixing and non-fixing eyes in children with IXT.
- The extent of accommodative variation is dependent on the specific type of IXT.
- Binocular accommodative function is demonstrably lower in children with IXT compared to their non-strabismic peers.
Abstract:
Objective: This study aims to investigate the monocular and binocular accommodative amplitude (AMP) and accommodative function (AF) in children with different types of intermittent exotropia (IXT). Methods: A total of 40 children with IXT were enrolled in the study. Monocular and binocular AMP and AF were measured using the modified approach method and the ±2D flip method, and the differences between the fixing and non-fixing eyes of non-strabismic children and children with different types of IXT were compared. Results: The AMP of the fixing eyes of children with IXT was lower than that of their non-fixing eyes (p = 0.007). Conversely, the AF was higher in the fixing eyes than in the non-fixing eyes (p < 0.001). The AMPs of each group of children with IXT were lower than those of the control group, while the AMP of the group with convergence insufficiency was lower than that of the other two groups with IXT. In addition, the AF of the group with convergence insufficiency was lower than that of the group with basic exotropia and the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There is a difference in accommodation between the fixing and non-fixing eyes of children with IXT, and the degree of variation depends on the type of IXT. Moreover, the binocular accommodative function of children with IXT is lower than that of non-strabismic children.
Related Concept Videos
Muscles of the Eye
Extraocular Muscles
The six extraocular muscles surround the eyeball and control its movements. They are responsible for a wide range of eye motions, including looking up, down, left, right, and...
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Accessory Structures of the Eye
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

