Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
Francesco Giganti1,2, Sydney Lindner3, Jonathan W Piper3
1Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. f.giganti@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract:
The technical requirements for the acquisition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate have been clearly outlined in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, but there is still huge variability in image quality among centres across the world. It has been difficult to quantify what constitutes a good-quality image, and a first attempt to address this matter has been the publication of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score and its dedicated scoring sheet. This score includes the assessment of technical parameters that can be obtained from the DICOM files along with a visual evaluation of certain features on prostate MRI (e.g., anatomical structures). We retrospectively analysed the image quality of 10 scans from different vendors and magnets using a semiautomated dedicated PI-QUAL software program and compared the time needed for assessing image quality using two methods (semiautomated assessment versus manual filling of the scoring sheet). This semiautomated software is able to assess the technical parameters automatically, but the visual assessment is still performed by the radiologist. There was a significant reduction in the reporting time of prostate mpMRI quality according to PI-QUAL using the dedicated software program compared to manual filling (5'54″ versus 7'59″; p = 0.005). A semiautomated PI-QUAL software program allows the radiologist to assess the technical details related to the image quality of prostate mpMRI in a quick and reliable manner, allowing clinicians to have more confidence that the quality of mpMRI of the prostate is sufficient to determine patient care.
Insights
A new semiautomated software significantly reduces the time needed to assess prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) image quality using the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score. This tool enhances reliability and confidence in mpMRI for patient care.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Quality Assurance
Background:
- Prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) quality varies globally despite PI-RADS guidelines.
- Quantifying image quality has been challenging, leading to the development of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score.
- The PI-QUAL score assesses technical parameters and visual features of prostate MRI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a semiautomated PI-QUAL software program for assessing prostate mpMRI image quality.
- To compare the time efficiency of semiautomated versus manual PI-QUAL assessment.
- To determine if the software improves the reliability and speed of quality assessment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 10 prostate mpMRI scans from diverse vendors and magnets.
- Utilized a semiautomated PI-QUAL software for technical parameter assessment.
- Compared reporting time between semiautomated software and manual PI-QUAL scoring sheet completion.
Main Results:
- The semiautomated PI-QUAL software automatically assesses technical parameters, requiring radiologist input for visual evaluation.
- A significant reduction in reporting time was observed using the semiautomated software (5'54″) compared to manual scoring (7'59″; p = 0.005).
- The software provides a quick and reliable method for assessing prostate mpMRI image quality.
Conclusions:
- Semiautomated PI-QUAL software streamlines the assessment of prostate mpMRI technical quality.
- This tool enhances efficiency and reliability for radiologists evaluating mpMRI scans.
- Improved quality assessment increases clinician confidence in using mpMRI for patient management decisions.

