Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

536
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
536
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

47.1K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
47.1K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

53.9K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
53.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Forest to Zoo: Great Ape Behavior Recognition with ChimpBehave.

International journal of computer vision·2025
Same author

A Dichotomy Law for Certain Classes of Phylogenetic Networks.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2025
Same author

Corrected T1 (cT1) is the most appropriate diagnosis and monitoring tool for widespread adoption of resmetirom treatment in the United States.

Journal of medical economics·2025
Same author

Brentuximab vedotin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in older patients.

HemaSphere·2025
Same author

Prospective Comparative Analysis of Simultaneous Microbiological Assessment in Septic Revision Arthroplasty: Can We Rely on Standard Diagnostics?

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Management of Clamshell Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Rarely Recognized Periprosthetic Injury Pattern.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

515

Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant.

Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig1,2, Sylvia Meuret1, Rolf-Dieter Battmer3,4

  • 1Section of Phoniatrics and Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Frontiers in Psychology
|November 8, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Cochlear implants (CI) can significantly improve sound localization and speech understanding in noise for individuals with single-sided deafness. While some challenges remain, CIs offer real-world benefits for orientation and communication.

Keywords:
cochlear implantinteraural level differenceinteraural time differencesingle-sided deafnesssound localizationspeech-in-noise

More Related Videos

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

955
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

516

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

515
Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
07:00

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process

Published on: June 21, 2024

955
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

516

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Engineering

Background:

  • Spatial hearing is essential but impaired in single-sided deafness.
  • Unilateral cochlear implants (CI) offer a potential solution for restoring auditory function.
  • Understanding sound localization with CI is critical for real-world benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate sound localization abilities in single-sided deafness patients with a unilateral CI.
  • To compare localization performance with normal-hearing individuals.
  • To assess the impact of CI on speech understanding in noise.

Main Methods:

  • Sound localization was measured at 8 positions using noise bursts (low/high frequency).
  • Localization was tested on both CI and normal-hearing sides.
  • Data were compared to a control group of normal-hearing adults.

Main Results:

  • Most participants (15/18) could localize sounds, but with high variability.
  • Localization difficulties were noted at frontal locations and on the CI side.
  • CI improved speech understanding in noise, particularly where localization was enhanced.

Conclusions:

  • Unilateral CI largely restores sound localization in single-sided deafness.
  • Frontal and CI-side localization challenges persist.
  • CI provides practical advantages in traffic and noisy environments.