Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Ventricular Assist Device
Tabea Amstad1, Jan Taeymans, Lars Englberger
1Zürcher RehaZentren Klinik Wald, Zürich, Switzerland (Ms Amstad and Dr Hermann); Section of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Berne, Switzerland (Ms Amstad and Dr Taeymans); University Hospital Berne (Inselspital), Bern, Switzerland (Drs Englberger and Mohacsi); Berner Reha Zentrum, Heiligenschwendi, Switzerland (Mr Steiner); and University Heart Center Zürich, UniversityHospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland (Drs Wilhelm and Hermann).
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to investigate changes in exercise capacity (EC) and quality of life (QoL) of patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs) during cardiac rehabilitation (CR).
Methods:
Data from patients with VAD implantation and subsequent CR between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Measures of the 6-min walk test [6MWT] distance, Functional Independence Measure [FIM], ergometry, MacNew Heart Disease Questionnaire [MNH], and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] at entry and discharge were examined.
Results:
Data from 110 patients (age 53 ± 12 yr; male 82%) were analyzed. Patients improved during CR significantly in the 6MWT (114 ± 85 m, P < .001), ergometry (20 ± 17 W, P = .002), FIM (8 ± 7 points, P < .001), and MNH (0.8 ± 0.7 points, P < .001). Initial HADS levels were high with a mean value of 9 and did not improve during CR (-0.4 ± 5 points, P = .637). Significant differences of improvements in the 6MWT were observed between left and biventricular VAD (129 ± 90 m vs 85 ± 67 m, P = .043) as well as destination therapy and bridge-to-transplant (184 ± 88 m vs 102 ± 82 m, P = .005).
Conclusions:
Patients with VAD implantation had statistically and clinically significant improvements in EC and QoL as assessed with the MNH during CR. Patients on destination therapy showed a larger benefit from CR than bridge-to-transplant patients and patients with left VAD improved more than biventricular VAD patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management

