Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical innovation and its evaluation.

J P Bunker, D Hinkley, W V McDermott

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |May 26, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The ELFIN Mission.

    Space science reviews·2020
    Same author

    Costs, Risks and Benefits of Surgery: a milestone in the development of health services research.

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2007
    Same author

    Ivan Illich and medical nemesis.

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2003
    Same author

    The role of medical care in contributing to health improvements within societies.

    International journal of epidemiology·2002
    Same author

    Differences in death rates in English hospitals. Data are inadequate basis for drawing conclusion of paper.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1999
    Same author

    Putting the risk of breast cancer in perspective.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1998

    Evaluating new medical operations requires early clinical trials and ongoing surveillance. Centralizing evaluation standards and funding in a national agency, while keeping implementation local, ensures effective healthcare assessment.

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Medical Technology Assessment
    • Clinical Evaluation

    Background:

    • Early clinical trials (observational or randomized) are crucial for evaluating new operations.
    • Long-term surveillance is essential for assessing operations after widespread adoption.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a framework for the centralized and decentralized evaluation of new medical operations.
    • To improve the systematic assessment of healthcare interventions.

    Main Methods:

    • The abstract outlines a conceptual approach, not a specific empirical study.
    • It emphasizes the roles of early trials, ongoing surveillance, and distinct organizational levels for evaluation.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A structured approach to evaluating new operations enhances prompt and continued assessment.
  • Centralized national oversight for standards and funding is proposed.
  • Local/regional mechanisms should manage implementation and regulation.

    • Conclusions:

    • A hybrid model with a national agency for oversight and local bodies for implementation is recommended.
    • This structure aims to optimize the evaluation of medical operations throughout their lifecycle.