Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Genome-wide RNAi Screening to Identify Host Factors That Modulate Oncolytic Virus Therapy
Published on: April 3, 2018
A systematic analysis on the clinical safety and efficacy of onco-virotherapy
Darshak K Bhatt1,2, Lieske Wekema1, Luciana Rodrigues Carvalho Barros2
1Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
Several onco-virotherapy candidates have been developed and clinically evaluated for the treatment of cancer, and several are approved for clinical use. In this systematic review we explored the clinical impact of onco-virotherapy compared to other cancer therapies by analyzing factors such as trial design, patient background, therapy design, delivery strategies, and study outcomes. For this purpose, we retrieved clinical studies from three platforms: ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and EMBASE. We found that most studies were performed in patients with advanced and metastatic tumors, using a broad range of genetically engineered vectors and mainly administered intratumorally. Therapeutic safety was the most frequently assessed outcome, while relatively few studies focused on immunological antitumor responses. Moreover, only 59 out of 896 clinical studies were randomized controlled trials reporting comparative data. This systemic review thus reveals the need of more, and better controlled, clinical studies to increase our understanding on the application of onco-virotherapy either as a single treatment or in combination with other cancer immunotherapies.
Insights
Onco-virotherapy shows promise for cancer treatment, but more controlled clinical trials are needed. Current research often focuses on safety over immune responses, highlighting a gap in understanding its full therapeutic potential.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Virology
- Immunotherapy
Background:
- Onco-virotherapy utilizes viruses to target and destroy cancer cells.
- Several onco-virotherapy agents are approved or in clinical trials for cancer treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the clinical impact of onco-virotherapy compared to other cancer therapies.
- To analyze trial design, patient characteristics, therapy, delivery, and outcomes in onco-virotherapy studies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and EMBASE.
- Analysis of trial design, patient demographics, therapeutic strategies, and reported outcomes.
Main Results:
- Most studies involved advanced/metastatic tumors, using diverse vectors, primarily administered intratumorally.
- Therapeutic safety was the main outcome assessed; immunological antitumor responses were less frequently studied.
- Only 59 of 896 studies were randomized controlled trials providing comparative data.
Conclusions:
- There is a need for more rigorous, controlled clinical studies in onco-virotherapy.
- Further research should focus on comparative efficacy and immunological responses to optimize treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Mechanisms of Retrovirus-induced Cancers
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Tumor Immunotherapy

