Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

05:26
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
6.9K
Seclusion in an enriched environment versus seclusion as usual: A quasi-experimental study using mixed methods
Cornelia G J M van der Venne1, Berno van Meijel1,2,3, Mathijs Deen1
1Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Plos One
|November 11, 2021
Summary
Psychiatric seclusion rooms, whether enriched or regular, do not significantly alter patient experience. Patients consistently find seclusion a dreadful experience, recommending distraction facilities regardless of room design.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Environmental Psychology
- Healthcare Design
Background:
- Patient seclusion in psychiatric treatment is frequently traumatic.
- Adjustments to seclusion room design have been suggested to mitigate negative patient experiences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically compare patient experiences in an 'Enriched Environment Seclusion' (EES) room versus a regular seclusion (RS) room.
- To investigate the impact of environmental design on the psychological impact of seclusion.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental design compared two groups of patients (n=26 EES, n=27 RS).
- The EES room included audio-visual facilities, a private toilet, a couch, and user-controlled lighting, color, blinds, and temperature.
- Patient experiences were assessed using the 'Patient View-of-Seclusion Questionnaire' and open-ended questions.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in seclusion experiences was found between the EES and RS groups (p = .21).
- Both groups described seclusion as a dreadful experience.
- Patients in the EES room appreciated distraction, while RS room patients desired more distractions.
Conclusions:
- Seclusion remains a burdensome experience for patients, irrespective of the physical environment or facilities.
- The availability of distraction facilities, as in EES rooms, is recommended if seclusion is unavoidable.
Related Concept Videos
Naturalistic Observations
16.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
16.5K
Group Design
9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K
Experimental Designs
15.9K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
15.9K
Blind Procedures
12.4K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.4K
Randomized Experiments
8.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.2K
Case Studies
12.7K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.7K

