Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

11.6K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
11.6K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

9.3K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
9.3K
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

12.9K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
12.9K
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

19.8K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
19.8K
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

293
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
293
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

444
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
444

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Occupational Radiation Exposures in Interventional Radiology and the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2026
Same author

Struck-by fatalities in construction: A systematic review of regulatory roles, responsibilities, and research gaps.

Journal of safety research·2026
Same author

Estimating effective dose using non-lead protective aprons and a single dosimeter method.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same author

Attitudes, needs, and opportunities for training on musculoskeletal disorder risk reduction in masonry.

BMC public health·2025
Same author

Resonant Drive Techniques for Electrostatic Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS): A Comparative Study.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

NEMS generated electromechanical frequency combs.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.9K

Inertial Motion Capture-Based Whole-Body Inverse Dynamics.

Mohsen M Diraneyya1, JuHyeong Ryu2, Eihab Abdel-Rahman3

  • 1Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto, 4925 Dufferin Street, North York, Toronto, ON M3H 5T6, Canada.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a new inverse dynamics model using Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) to estimate joint forces and moments without force plates. The dynamic model significantly improves accuracy, avoiding underestimation common in static models.

Keywords:
ergonomicsinertial motion capture (IMC)inverse dynamicsjoint loadphysical exposure

More Related Videos

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.0K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.9K
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.0K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Motion Analysis
  • Kinetics

Background:

  • Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems impose significant constraints on human motion studies.
  • Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) offers greater freedom for in situ human motion analysis.
  • Inverse dynamics is crucial for estimating internal forces and moments in muscles and joints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an inverse dynamics whole-body model utilizing IMC data.
  • To eliminate the need for force plates (FPs) in estimating joint forces and moments.
  • To compare the accuracy of the dynamic model against traditional methods and static estimations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel inverse dynamics whole-body model integrating IMC motion data.
  • Validated Ground Reaction Force (GRF) predictions against force plate measurements.
  • Compared net joint moment predictions with the 3D Static Strength Prediction Program (3DSSPP).

Main Results:

  • The IMC-based model achieved a 6% relative root-mean-square error (rRMSE) for GRF prediction.
  • Intraclass correlation for peak GRF values reached 0.95.
  • rRMSE for L5/S1, right shoulder, and left shoulder joint moments were 9.5%, 3.3%, and 5.2%, respectively.

Conclusions:

  • The developed IMC-based inverse dynamics model accurately estimates joint forces and moments.
  • Dynamic analysis is essential, as static models can underestimate net joint moments by 90% to 560%.