Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Hierarchical management of chronic heart failure: a perspective based on the latent structure of comorbidities
Chu Zheng1, Linai Han2, Jing Tian2,3
1Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Insights
Identifying distinct patient clusters in chronic heart failure (CHF) based on comorbidities is crucial. The high comorbidity burden cluster faces the highest mortality and readmission risks, highlighting the need for personalized management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology and Geriatrics
- Health Services Research
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (CHF) is increasingly associated with multiple comorbidities, complicating patient management and affecting clinical outcomes.
- Existing research has limited focus on the clustering and hierarchical management of CHF patients according to their comorbidity profiles.
- Understanding comorbidity patterns is essential for tailoring treatment and improving prognosis in CHF patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct patient clusters within chronic heart failure (CHF) based on comorbidity patterns using latent class analysis.
- To investigate the relationship between these identified comorbidity clusters and key clinical outcomes, including mortality and hospital readmission.
- To provide evidence supporting a hierarchical management approach for CHF patients tailored to their specific comorbidity burden.
Main Methods:
- Latent class analysis was applied to electronic health records of 4063 CHF patients hospitalized between January 2014 and April 2019, incorporating 12 common comorbidities.
- Comorbidity networks were visualized using the Fruchterman-Reingold layout, with weighted degrees compared via analysis of variance.
- Clinical outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard models, with sensitivity analyses based on left ventricular ejection fraction.
Main Results:
- Four distinct CHF patient clusters were identified: metabolic, ischaemic, high comorbidity burden, and elderly-atrial fibrillation.
- The high comorbidity burden cluster exhibited the highest adjusted risks for combined outcomes (HR 1.67) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.87) compared to the metabolic cluster.
- Patients in the high comorbidity burden, elderly-atrial fibrillation, and ischaemic clusters showed significantly increased adjusted readmission risks (HRs ranging from 1.35 to 1.42).
Conclusions:
- The identified clusters and their differential adverse outcomes underscore the heterogeneity of chronic heart failure (CHF) and the necessity of hierarchical management strategies.
- This study provides a data-driven foundation for personalized treatment and management plans for CHF patients, optimizing clinical decision-making.
- The findings offer a novel perspective on stratifying CHF patients by comorbidity profiles to better predict and mitigate adverse clinical events.
Aims:
Chronic heart failure (CHF) has an increasing burden of comorbidities, which affect clinical outcomes. Few studies have focused on the clustering and hierarchical management of patients with CHF based on comorbidity. This study aimed to explore the cluster model of CHF patients based on comorbidities and to verify their relationship with clinical outcomes.
Methods And Results:
Electronic health records of patients hospitalized with CHF from January 2014 to April 2019 were collected, and 12 common comorbidities were included in the latent class analysis. The Fruchterman-Reingold layout was used to draw the comorbidity network, and analysis of variance was used to compare the weighted degrees among them. The incidence of clinical outcomes among different clusters was presented on Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test, and the hazard ratio was calculated using the Cox proportional risk model. Sensitivity analysis was performed according to the left ventricular ejection fraction. Four different clinical clusters from 4063 total patients were identified: metabolic, ischaemic, high comorbidity burden, and elderly-atrial fibrillation. Compared with the metabolic cluster, patients in the high comorbidity burden cluster had the highest adjusted risk of combined outcome and all-cause mortality {1.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-1.99] and 2.87 [95% CI, 2.17-3.81], respectively}, followed by the elderly-atrial fibrillation and ischaemic clusters. The adjusted readmission risk of patients with ischaemic, high comorbidity burden, and elderly-atrial fibrillation clusters were 1.35 (95% CI, 1.08-1.68), 1.39 (95% CI, 1.13-1.72), and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.14-1.77), respectively. The comorbidity network analysis found that patients in the high comorbidity burden cluster had more and higher comorbidity correlations than those in other clusters. Sensitivity analysis revealed that patients in the high comorbidity burden cluster had the highest risk of combined outcome and all-cause mortality (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
The difference in adverse outcomes among clusters confirmed the heterogeneity of CHF and the importance of hierarchical management. This study can provide a basis for personalized treatment and management of patients with CHF, and provide a new perspective for clinical decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure I: Introduction

