Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Patients Frequently Overestimate Their Comprehension of Common Mohs Micrographic Surgery Terms: A Cross-Sectional
Background:
Patients who understand their diagnosis and treatment are more likely to be satisfied with their care and more compliant with treatment. Dermatologic surgery is a specialized field with associated jargon that many patients may not understand.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to assess patient understanding of dermatology medical terminology.
Methods:
This was a single-blinded study conducted with patients 18 years and older from an academic dermatology clinic surveying patients on 12 terms that are frequently used in dermatologic surgery. Participants rated their level of confidence in their understanding of each term using a 5-point Likert scale, followed by explaining the definition of the term. 3 blinded physicians graded each participant’s definition using a 5-point scale of accuracy of understanding, designed to mimic the Likert scale.
Results:
A total of 200 respondents completed the survey (96% response rate). The average term perceived understanding was 3.90 ±0.66, the average term accuracy was 3.26±0.93. Patients overestimated their understanding 44% of the time, and underestimated their knowledge 17% of the time. The terms with the lowest respondent confidence were the terms secondary intention, Mohs, and flaps. The terms with the lowest respondent accuracy was secondary intention, defect, and Mohs surgery.
Conclusion:
There is a gap in knowledge in commonly used dermatologic surgery terms among patients. Certain demographics appear to be more at risk for not understanding medical jargon or overestimating their understanding of terms. Obtaining these patient demographics may help to identify patients needing additional education regarding dermatologic surgery. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(11):1252-1254. doi:10.36849/JDD.6174.
