Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

06:46
A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
2.9K
Cost Analysis of Screening for IgA Nephropathy Using Novel Biomarkers
Mami Ishida1, Keiichi Matsuzaki2, Hiroshi Ikai3
1Department of Preventive Services, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Value in Health Regional Issues
|November 18, 2021
Summary
Screening for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) using novel biomarkers is more cost-effective than conventional methods alone. This approach reduces overall medical expenses and lowers the rate of dialysis introduction for patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Biomarker Discovery
- Health Economics
Background:
- IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease globally.
- Novel biomarkers, including aberrantly glycosylated IgA1 and specific antibodies, show promise for IgAN diagnosis.
- Current screening methods for IgAN may not be fully cost-effective.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a cost analysis comparing IgA nephropathy (IgAN) screening using novel biomarkers plus conventional screening versus conventional screening alone.
- To evaluate the long-term medical expenses associated with each screening strategy from a societal perspective.
Main Methods:
- An analytical decision model was developed to simulate medical expenses over 40 years.
- Two strategies were compared: IgAN screening with novel biomarkers (Group N) and conventional screening (Group C).
- The model initiated with individuals aged 40 presenting with first-time hematuria; discounting was not applied.
Main Results:
- The novel biomarker strategy (Group N) was projected to cost ¥2.2 million (~$21,000) less per person over 40 years compared to conventional screening (Group C).
- Group N showed an increase in IgAN diagnosis (48.44% vs. 42.77%) and a decrease in dialysis introduction (19.06% vs. 19.91%).
- Sensitivity analysis indicated cost reductions in most scenarios, except when renal biopsy rates exceeded 73% in conventional screening.
Conclusions:
- Screening for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) incorporating novel biomarkers is a more cost-effective approach than conventional screening alone.
- The use of novel biomarkers in IgAN screening can lead to reduced healthcare expenditures related to renal disease.
Keywords:
IgA nephropathychronic kidney diseasecost analysiscost-effectivenessend-stage kidney diseasenovel biomarkersscreening
