Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

An Engineered Split-TET2 Enzyme for Chemical-inducible DNA Hydroxymethylation and Epigenetic Remodeling
Published on: December 18, 2017
A split cytosine deaminase architecture enables robust inducible base editing
Jie Long1, Nan Liu1, Wenling Tang1
1Laboratory of Biotherapy, National Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan university, Chengdu, China.
Scientists developed an inducible base editor using split deaminases, controlled by rapamycin. This controllable base editing technology significantly reduces off-target edits, enhancing safety for potential clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Genomics
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Base editing technology allows precise genome modification but faces challenges with off-target edits.
- Cytosine to thymine base editors, in particular, raise concerns about genomic instability and tumorigenesis due to unpredictable off-target activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a controllable base editing tool that minimizes off-target effects.
- To engineer an inducible base editor activated by a clinically safe chemical, rapamycin.
Main Methods:
- Designed four split-human APOBEC3A (A3A)-BE3 base editors by splitting A3A at sites opposite the protein-nucleotide interface.
- Utilized a rapamycin-inducible interaction system (FRB and FKBP) for deaminase reconstruction.
- Tested the editing efficiency and specificity of the split editors in the presence and absence of rapamycin.
- Expanded the strategy to rat APOBEC1 (rA1).
Main Results:
- Three out of four split-A3A-derived base editors demonstrated robust inducible editing upon rapamycin addition.
- Editing activity was significantly inhibited in the absence of rapamycin, confirming inducibility.
- Splicing at Aa85 of A3A yielded the most efficient inducible editing.
- Splitting deaminases did not significantly alter the editing window or motif preference but improved product purity.
- Similar inducible responses were observed with rat APOBEC1.
Conclusions:
- Splitting deaminases is a viable strategy for creating controllable base editing tools.
- This inducible system offers enhanced safety by allowing precise temporal control over base editing activity.
- The developed technology holds promise for safer genome editing applications, potentially overcoming major hurdles for clinical translation.
More Related Videos
07:46CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.
Published on: December 11, 2020
07:31Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
Published on: February 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
RNA Editing
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Genome Copying Errors