Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
Source contribution analysis of PM2.5 using Response Surface Model and Particulate Source Apportionment Technology
Zhifang Li1, Yun Zhu1, Shuxiao Wang2
1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, College of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Accurately identifying particulate matter (PM2.5) sources is key for pollution control. This study compares two models, finding Response Surface Model (RSM) better captures complex secondary PM2.5 formation than Particulate Source Apportionment Technology (PSAT).
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Atmospheric Chemistry
- Air Pollution Modeling
Background:
- Particulate matter (PM2.5) pollution necessitates accurate source identification for effective policy.
- Existing models like PSAT have limitations in quantifying nonlinear secondary PM2.5 formation.
- The Pearl River Delta (PRD) faces significant PM2.5 challenges requiring advanced source apportionment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively analyze PM2.5 source contributions in the PRD using RSM and PSAT.
- To evaluate the performance of RSM and PSAT in modeling primary and secondary PM2.5 formation.
- To identify key emission sources contributing to ambient PM2.5 in PRD cities.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of two advanced source contribution modeling techniques: Response Surface Model (RSM) and Particulate Source Apportionment Technology (PSAT).
- Application of models to PM2.5 data from the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region.
- Assessment of model capabilities in handling linear (primary) and nonlinear (secondary) PM2.5 formation processes.
Main Results:
- Both RSM and PSAT reasonably predict primary PM2.5 source contributions.
- RSM demonstrates superior ability in quantifying nonlinear secondary PM2.5 formation compared to PSAT.
- Regional sources are the largest contributors (42-66%) to PRD urban PM2.5, followed by dust (27-34%) and mobile sources (16-30%).
Conclusions:
- RSM is better suited for modeling complex, nonlinear PM2.5 precursor interactions.
- Dust and mobile sources are significant anthropogenic contributors to PRD PM2.5.
- Coordinated city-scale emission reductions and enhanced control of dust and mobile sources are recommended for PRD PM2.5 mitigation.
Related Concept Videos
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...

