Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Comparative life cycle assessment of a year-round grazing system vs. a hay-feeding system
K R Trumpp1, J C B Dubeux1, A Martin-Ryals2
1North Florida Research and Education Center-Marianna, University of Florida, 3925 Highway 71, Marianna, FL, 32446, USA.
Abstract:
Grasslands cover around 4.5 million hectares in Florida, primarily consisting of C4 warm-season forage species, under different managements. In North Florida, beef-cattle operations go through a cool season, a warm season, and a fall gap, which marks the overlap between both seasons. The most widespread practice among producers involves grazing during the warm season and feeding hay during the winter. However, this requires many off-farm inputs and is associated with greater indirect and direct emissions. Thus, a more sustainable alternative is necessary. Year-round grazing has potential, since it takes advantage of different complementary forage species, allowing grazing throughout the year. The goal of this study was to develop and conduct a comparative life cycle assessment evaluating the environmental impact of beef cattle in the backgrounding stage of a year-round grazing system versus hay-feeding systems. Greater environmental impacts were observed for global warming potential, fossil fuel scarcity, and freshwater eutrophication in the hay-feeding system. The global warming potential averaged 2.25 kg CO2eq kg-1 liveweight gain for the year-round grazing compared to 4.87 kg CO2eq kg-1 liveweight gain for the hay system. Enteric fermentation was the largest contributor to global warming potential. Besides, the hay-feeding system used more inputs, particularly fossil fuels and N-fertilizers, to maintain its high production and profitability. Freshwater eutrophication potential was greater for the hay-feeding system than for the year-round grazing, averaging 0.19 kg Peq kg-1 liveweight gain compared to 0.09 kg Peq kg-1 liveweight gain, respectively. Similarly, fossil resource scarcity averaged 0.048 and 0.065 kg oileq kg-1 liveweight gain for the year-round grazing and hay-feeding system, respectively. The year-round grazing system is an alternative for reducing the environmental impact of beef cattle operations.
More Related Videos
09:23JenaTron - An Experimental Approach to Study the Effects of Plant History and Soil History on Grassland Ecosystem Functioning
Published on: March 21, 2025
10:19A CO2 Concentration Gradient Facility for Testing CO2 Enrichment and Soil Effects on Grassland Ecosystem Function
Published on: November 21, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Energy Budgets and Reproductive Strategies
Production Efficiency