Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025
Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
Comparison between Nondedicated and Novel Dedicated Tracking Tool for Right Ventricular and Left Atrial Strain
Oana Mirea1, Jürgen Duchenne2, Jens-Uwe Voigt3
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Background:
Recently, dedicated speckle-tracking solutions for right ventricular (RV) and left atrial (LA) strain assessment have become commercially available. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of agreement between nondedicated (left ventricular [LV] tracking software) and novel dedicated tracking software for RV and LA strain.
Methods:
In 200 patients with various cardiovascular pathologies, we measured global longitudinal strain (GLS), free wall strain (FWS), and segmental values, as well as LA strain during reservoir, conduit, and contraction phases, by using the (1) LV-tracking software and (2) the novel dedicated tracking software for RV or LA strain analysis. Agreement between corresponding measurements obtained with the LV and dedicated RV or LA software was determined by using mean absolute difference (MAD) and Bland-Altman test. The intra- and interobserver reproducibility related to the nondedicated and novel dedicated tracking software was tested in 30 randomly selected subjects.
Results:
The dedicated RV-tracking software provided slightly lower strain values without reaching statistical significance. The agreement between software was best for RV GLS (MAD, 2.4 ± 1.8) and significantly poorer for segmental values (MAD ranging from 4.5 ± 3.8 to 5.1 ± 4.0; analysis of variance, P < .05). The intra- and interobserver reproducibility for RV measurements was similar with both software (P > .05 for all parameters). Left atrial mean values showed no statistical difference when obtained with the two tracking tools. The use of LA dedicated tracking software increased significantly the intra- and interobserver reproducibility for LA strain during reservoir and atrial contraction (P < .01 for both).
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that the choice of tracking software does not significantly impact RV strain measurements. Nonetheless, the use of the same tracking software is recommended when performing serial measurements. The use of the dedicated software for LA strain analysis significantly improved the intra- and interobserver reproducibility.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
09:05Transthoracic Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for the Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Deformation
Published on: October 20, 2016