Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
The current landscape of systemic therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: A systematic review of randomized-controlled
Francesco G T Fazzari1, Foster Rose1, Mehrnoosh Pauls2
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd #2044, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.
Aim:
Conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of systemic therapies for adult recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).
Methods:
We electronically searched for randomized controlled trials from three major databases and four conferences from 2009-Dec 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment.
Results:
48 randomized trials were identified. Outcome reporting was inconsistent: overall survival (OS) in 46 studies, progression free survival in 37 studies, 6-month PFS in 30 studies, objective response rate in 28 studies, and 6-month OS in 7 studies. Network meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity in outcome reporting and single-study linkages. Most studies compared lomustine (8 studies), bevacizumab (18), or temozolomide (8) with other treatments. The median OS across all studies ranged from 3 to 17.6 months.
Conclusions:
Based on level one evidence, there is no superior systemic regimen for rGBM. rGBM is a heterogeneous population with no single regimen demonstrating OS benefit. Registration number: CRD42020148512.
Insights
No single systemic therapy shows superiority for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). This review found no regimen significantly improved overall survival in the heterogeneous rGBM patient population.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Systematic Reviews
Background:
- Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) presents a significant challenge in adult brain tumor treatment.
- Identifying effective systemic therapies is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the effectiveness of systemic therapies for adult recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).
- To evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Electronic searches of major databases and conference proceedings from 2009-2020.
- Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment by two independent reviewers.
- Analysis of 48 identified randomized trials, noting outcome reporting heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- Inconsistent reporting of outcomes including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
- Network meta-analysis was not feasible due to significant heterogeneity.
- Commonly compared agents included lomustine, bevacizumab, and temozolomide, with median OS ranging from 3 to 17.6 months.
Conclusions:
- Level one evidence indicates no single systemic regimen is superior for rGBM.
- The heterogeneity of rGBM patient populations limits the identification of a universally beneficial treatment.
- Further research is needed to address treatment disparities in rGBM.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers

