Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wavefront shaping enables high-power multimode fiber amplifier with output focus.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Assessing the Impact of Simplified Language on a Patient-Facing Pharmacogenetic Report: A User Comprehension Study.

Journal of personalized medicine·2025
Same author

Consensus Statement on Brillouin Light Scattering Microscopy of Biological Materials.

ArXiv·2024
Same author

Engineered modular neuronal networks-on-chip represent structure-function relationship.

Biosensors & bioelectronics·2024
Same author

Resolution-enhanced multi-core fiber imaging learned on a digital twin for cancer diagnosis.

Neurophotonics·2024
Same author

Calibration-free quantitative phase imaging in multi-core fiber endoscopes using end-to-end deep learning.

Optics letters·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
08:39

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

10.0K

Benchmarking analysis of computer generated holograms for complex wavefront shaping using pixelated phase modulators.

Stefan Rothe, Philipp Daferner, Sebastian Heide

    Optics Express
    |November 23, 2021
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study compares four computer-generated hologram (CGH) algorithms for wavefront shaping. Algorithm choice significantly impacts performance in complex media like multimode fibers, guiding holographic system development.

    More Related Videos

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
    09:43

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

    Published on: March 20, 2017

    10.0K
    Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo
    09:36

    Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

    Published on: March 19, 2016

    8.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

    Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
    08:39

    Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

    Published on: January 28, 2019

    10.0K
    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
    09:43

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

    Published on: March 20, 2017

    10.0K
    Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo
    09:36

    Characterization of Anisotropic Leaky Mode Modulators for Holovideo

    Published on: March 19, 2016

    8.1K

    Area of Science:

    • Optics and Photonics
    • Holography
    • Biomedical Optics

    Background:

    • Wavefront shaping using spatial light modulators (SLMs) corrects aberrations for light propagation through scattering media.
    • High-fidelity light field shaping relies on efficient computer-generated hologram (CGH) algorithms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the performance of four distinct CGH algorithms for complex light field generation.
    • To analyze the impact of parameters like pixel number and phase resolution on CGH algorithm performance.
    • To provide guidance for selecting appropriate CGH algorithms for holographic applications.

    Main Methods:

    • Investigated two iterative CGH algorithms: Gerchberg-Saxton and direct search.
    • Investigated two analytical CGH algorithms: superpixel and phase encoding.
    • Performed parameter studies varying modulator pixel number and phase resolution.
    • Analyzed mode field generation in multimode fibers for endoscopy and communication.

    Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that the selection of CGH algorithms significantly influences achievable light field shaping performance.
    • Showcased the ability to generate specific mode combinations in multimode fibers based on spatial frequency power spectra.
    • Highlighted the impact of varying spatial frequencies across different implementation scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of CGH algorithm is critical for optimizing wavefront shaping in complex media.
    • This comparative study offers essential insights for selecting CGH algorithms to enhance holographic systems.
    • Findings are applicable to advancing multimode fiber endoscopy and communication technologies.