Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.0K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

4.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
4.3K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

170
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
170
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

4.8K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
4.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

369
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
369
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

298
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
298

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Benchmarking Institutional Support for Point-of-Care Testing Programs: Scale, Staffing, and Operational Challenges.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Subclinical Primary Aldosteronism and eGFR Decline Over Time.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2026
Same author

Hickam's Dictum in Hypertension.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2025
Same author

Subclinical Primary Aldosteronism and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort Study.

Circulation·2025
Same author

Recommendations for the integration of standardized quality indicators for glucose point-of-care testing.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

Precision of point of care glucose metre measurements in the context of neonatal hypoglycemia.

Paediatrics & child health·2024
Same journal

Hypophosphatasia with Coexisting Endocrinopathies: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

EJIFCC·2026
Same journal

Beneficial Intelligence in Laboratory Medicine: Aligning Human and Artificial Intelligence for Value-Based Outcomes.

EJIFCC·2026
Same journal

An optimized method for setting Internal Quality Control targets (mean and limits) for multi-instrument Internal Quality Control strategies in hematology?

EJIFCC·2026
Same journal

Clinicians' Perspectives on the Impact of a Ransomware Attack on a Chemical Pathology Laboratory at a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa.

EJIFCC·2026
Same journal

A Mini-Review of Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing in Sepsis in the Emergency Department.

EJIFCC·2026
Same journal

Laboratory Professionals' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Laboratory Medicine: Insights from a National Survey in Albania.

EJIFCC·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.2K

Identifying and Reducing Errors in Point-of-Care Testing.

Julie L V Shaw1

  • 1Division of Biochemistry, The Ottawa Hospital, Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratories Association, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

EJIFCC
|November 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quality assurance audits for point-of-care testing (POCT) improve accuracy. Implementing QA practices in POCT reduces errors and enhances result interpretation, ensuring reliable patient diagnostics at the bedside.

Keywords:
POCTauditsquality assurancequality improvement

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Development of Simplified CRISPR-Based Tests for Rapid Detection of Infectious Diseases
10:16

Author Spotlight: Development of Simplified CRISPR-Based Tests for Rapid Detection of Infectious Diseases

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.5K
Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
06:55

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.2K
Author Spotlight: Development of Simplified CRISPR-Based Tests for Rapid Detection of Infectious Diseases
10:16

Author Spotlight: Development of Simplified CRISPR-Based Tests for Rapid Detection of Infectious Diseases

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.5K
Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
06:55

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Diagnostics
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Point-of-care testing (POCT) is performed near patients, often by non-laboratory trained staff.
  • Ensuring quality assurance (QA) for POCT is crucial but often overlooked by users.
  • Central laboratories typically oversee POCT QA within hospital settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of QA audits on POCT compliance and quality.
  • To demonstrate how audit findings can drive quality improvement initiatives.
  • To reduce errors and improve result interpretation in POCT.

Main Methods:

  • Conducting regular audits of POCT users for compliance with policies.
  • Analyzing audit and follow-up data.
  • Implementing and assessing three targeted quality improvement initiatives based on audit results.

Main Results:

  • QA audit practices were directly linked to a reduction in POCT errors.
  • Improved quality of result interpretation was observed following QA interventions.
  • Audit data informed effective quality improvement strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic QA audits are essential for maintaining high-quality POCT.
  • Proactive quality management in POCT leads to more reliable diagnostic information.
  • Collaboration between central labs and POCT users enhances patient care through improved testing accuracy.