Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Murine Renal Transplantation Procedure
Published on: July 10, 2009
Lessons Learned from a Small Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Program
Tanya Holt1, Olivia Griffin2, Amelie Cyr2
1Jim Pattison Children's Hospital, Pediatric Intensive Care, 103 Hospital Drive, S7N 0W8, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Insights
Small pediatric intensive care units can successfully implement continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This study shows a small-volume CRRT program achieved good outcomes and quality indicators, demonstrating feasibility for other centers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Renal Replacement Therapy
Background:
- Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is crucial in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
- Quality indicators (QIs) assess CRRT safety and effectiveness.
- Limited data exists on outcomes and QIs for smaller CRRT programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, and outcomes of a small-volume CRRT program.
- To assess the feasibility of implementing CRRT in resource-limited settings.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 82 patients receiving CRRT over 13 years.
- Analysis of patient survival, mortality predictors, and CRRT quality indicators.
Main Results:
- Overall survival to discharge was 79%.
- Independent predictors of mortality included sepsis/nonseptic shock and delayed CRRT initiation.
- The program met positive outcomes for CRRT efficiency, timely initiation, dosing, and adverse event rates.
Conclusions:
- Small-volume CRRT programs can provide safe and effective care.
- This study highlights the opportunity for smaller centers to establish CRRT services.
- Positive outcomes and QIs demonstrate the viability of CRRT in diverse settings.
Abstract:
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become a pillar of care in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) over the past few decades. Quality indicators (QIs) have been evaluated that reflect safe and accountable CRRT. However, there is a paucity of data on outcomes and QIs in smaller-volume CRRT programming. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficiencies, effectiveness, and outcomes of a small-volume CRRT program. Eighty-two patients received CRRT over a 13-year period, and 79% survived to discharge. Sepsis or nonseptic shock (n = 11 (22%) versus n = 6 (50%); p value = 0.004) and time to CRRT initiation after PICU admission (1.1 versus 5.0 days; p value = 0.005) were independent predictors for mortality. The program also had positive outcomes for QIs related to CRRT efficiency and time of initiation, dosing delivery, and rate of adverse events. This study is important as it illustrates the opportunity that smaller centers have to initiate CRRT programming and provide safe and effective care.
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management

