Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

13:42
RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
Published on: May 31, 2013
31.7K
Progress toward SHAPE Constrained Computational Prediction of Tertiary Interactions in RNA Structure.
Grégoire De Bisschop1,2, Delphine Allouche1,3, Elisa Frezza1
1Université de Paris, CNRS, UMR 8038/CiTCoM, F-75006 Paris, France.
Non-Coding RNA
|November 29, 2021
Summary
Accurate RNA structure modeling is crucial. This study uses chemical probing and molecular dynamics to reveal complex RNA interactions, improving computational predictions.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Computational Biology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Accurate RNA structure modeling is essential for understanding genetic regulation, but challenges remain due to RNA flexibility and complex interactions like pseudoknots.
- Current thermodynamic models and computational methods struggle to reliably predict large RNA structures, especially those involving non-canonical base pairs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of chemical probing, specifically SHAPE reactivity, in identifying nucleotides involved in pseudoknots and non-canonical interactions within large RNA molecules.
- To explore how varying experimental conditions (reagents, Mg2+ presence, temperature) and molecular dynamics simulations can enhance the accuracy of RNA structure prediction.
Main Methods:
- Scrutinized SHAPE (Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension) reactivity of each nucleotide in an 188 nt lariat-capping ribozyme under multiple conditions.
- Analyzed reactivity data in conjunction with X-ray structures and performed molecular dynamics simulations to rationalize nucleotide behavior and identify complex interactions.
- Investigated probing at increasing temperatures and with different reagents, including the presence or absence of Mg2+.
Main Results:
- SHAPE reactivities accurately reported nucleotide status when analyzed with X-ray structures, with paradoxical reactivities explained by molecular dynamics simulations.
- Valuable information on intricate RNA interactions was obtained by probing with different reagents and varying Mg2+ concentrations.
- Probing at increasing temperatures proved highly effective in identifying non-canonical interactions and pseudoknot pairings.
Conclusions:
- Chemical probing, particularly SHAPE, combined with molecular dynamics, provides crucial insights into complex RNA structures, including pseudoknots and non-canonical interactions.
- Optimizing probing strategies, such as varying temperature and reagent conditions, significantly enhances the ability to deduce intricate RNA structural features.
- These findings offer a pathway to improve computational RNA structure modeling software by providing more accurate input data.
Related Concept Videos
RNA Structure
5.5K
The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
5.5K
Predicting Molecular Geometry
37.0K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
37.0K
Conserved Binding Sites
4.7K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.7K
Protein Organization
149.5K
Overview
149.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy
12.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.0K
Nucleic Acid Structure
7.5K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
DNA Structure
DNA...
7.5K

