Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Management of Interrupted Aortic Arch With Associated Anomalies: A Single-Center Experience
Mehmet A Onalan1, Bahar Temur1, Selim Aydın1
1Atakent Hospital, 162328Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Objectives:
Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) includes a broad spectrum of associated anomalies. In this study, we present our surgical management and patient-specific decisions regarding IAA anomalies with early- and mid-term outcomes.
Methods:
The medical records of 25 patients undergoing IAA repair between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixteen patients had type B (64%) interruptions, 7 had type A (28%) interruptions, and 2 had type C (8%) interruptions. Fourteen patients had an isolated ventricular septal defect, and 3 of them had associated left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Other associated anomalies were functional single ventricle (n = 5), Taussig-Bing anomaly (n = 3), aortopulmonary window (n = 1), multiple ventricular septal defects (n = 1), and truncus arteriosus with dextrocardia (n = 1). The initial operation age was 17.2 ± 14 (range: 1 - 60) days.
Results:
Single-stage total repair was performed for 15 patients. Six patients underwent aortic arch repair and pulmonary artery banding. Four patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction or who were premature underwent the hybrid procedure. The aortic arch repair was performed in 16 cases (64%) by the anterior patch augmentation technique, in 3 cases (12%) by the reverse left subclavian artery flap technique, and in 3 cases (12%) by direct end-to-end anastomosis. Postoperative early mortality occurred in 4 (16%) patients, and sternal closure was delayed in 13 (52%) patients. Three patients who underwent a hybrid procedure due to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction underwent biventricular repair 8 to 13 months later. Eight patients (38%) required reintervention due to arch restenosis during the follow-up period. The mean follow-up was 37.1 ± 21.7 months.
Conclusion:
Planning surgical treatment according to the characteristics of the patients and accompanying anomalies may improve the results.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

