Related Experiment Videos
Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastroenterostomy: 1. Techniques derived from laboratory evaluation
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|March 1, 1986
Summary
Percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) and percutaneous gastroenterostomy (PGE) techniques were evaluated in animal and cadaver models. While generally safe, potential complications like vessel injury and malpositioning necessitate careful technique refinement.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Techniques
- Medical Device Evaluation
Background:
- Percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) and percutaneous gastroenterostomy (PGE) are common procedures.
- Optimizing techniques and understanding potential complications are crucial for patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate various techniques, guidance systems, and instruments for PG and PGE.
- To assess the postmortem effects and potential complications of these procedures.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of 30 laboratory animals and five human cadavers.
- Assessment of different stomach distension methods (air, fluid, balloon, needle inflation).
- Testing of various trocar systems and catheters, including Seldinger technique insertion, with fluoroscopy and sonography guidance.
Main Results:
- Fluoroscopy was preferred, but sonography provided valuable information for vessel avoidance and depth calculation.
- Major complications included liver laceration, catheter malpositioning, and vessel injury (celiac, splenic, inferior epigastric artery).
- Firm gastrocutaneous tracts formed by 7 days; few instances of infection or leakage occurred with well-seated catheters.
Conclusions:
- Laboratory models are essential for refining PG and PGE techniques.
- Careful attention to anatomical hazards, such as the inferior epigastric artery, is necessary.
- Continuous improvement of instruments and procedural guidance is vital for enhancing safety and efficacy.