Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Evaluation of ocular biometric parameters in keratoconic eyes relative to healthy myopic eyes
Ayşe Yağmur Kanra1, Haşim Uslu2
1506079Sultan Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objective:
To assess the biometric features of keratoconic eyes using the Lenstar LS900 and Pentacam systems relative to healthy myopic eyes.
Materials And Methods:
Seventy-three eyes of keratoconic subjects and 83 eyes of control subjects were enrolled. To evaluate the reproducibility of the Lenstar and Pentacam devices' measurements, keratometric readings [in flattest meridian (Kf), in steepest meridian (Ks), and mean (Km)], central corneal thickness (CCT), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were obtained using both systems. Axial length and lens thickness (LT) were measured by the Lenstar. The compatibility between the two devices was investigated using the Bland-Altman statistical method.
Results:
Axial length was longer in the myopic group than in eyes with keratoconus (24.94 ± 0.7 and 23.88 ± 0.96 mm, respectively, p < 0.001). LT and vitreous depth were also higher in the myopic group, although ACD values were similar. Compared to the Lenstar, the Pentacam measured the ACD and CCT values higher in the myopia group [with a difference of 0.07 ± 0.12 mm (p <0.001) and 4.47 ± 11.33 µm (p = 0.001), respectively] and measured the CCT values higher in the keratoconus group. Pentacam found all keratometry values significantly lower than Lenstar in the keratoconus group.
Conclusions:
Axial length was longer in the myopic eyes due to the differences starting from the lens and extending to the posterior segment. Lenstar and Pentacam can be used interchangeably for Km, Kf, and ACD in the myopic group and only for ACD in the keratoconus group.
