[The diagnostic performance of 2020 Chinese Ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in thyroid nodules]

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Chinese Ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) in thyroid nodules,and to compare it with the TIRADS proposed by Kwak et al. (K-TIRADS) and the TIRADS proposed by the American College of Radiology (ACR-TIRADS). Methods: The data of 1 750 patients with 2 029 thyroid nodules in the Department of Thyroid Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from January 2018 to November 2020 was retrospectively collected. Among them, there were 328 males and 1 422 females,aged from 6 to 86 with an average of (47±12) years. The nodules were divided into≤1.0 cm group(n=997) and>1.0 cm group(n=1 032)based on the size of the nodules. The stratification for malignant risk and the determination of benign or malignancy of the nodules was evaluated using the C-TIRADS, K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of the aforementioned three kinds of TIRADS using pathological results as the referent standard. Results: The optimal diagnosis points in the determination of malignant nodules of C-TIRADS, K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in the two groups were 4A, 4b and 4 respectively according to ROC curve analysis. For the diagnosis of the malignant nodules, the C-TIRADS achieved with an AUC value of 0.772 and 0.892 in the ≤1.0 cm group and>1.0 cm group, respectively, which was significantly higher than K-TIRADS (AUC= 0.762 and 0.869, respectively) and ACR-TIRADS (AUC= 0.735 and 0.832, respectively) (P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of C-TIRADS were 94.99%, 59.41%, 86.46%, 88.13%, 78.89% (≤1.0 cm group)and 88.34%, 90.05%, 89.34%, 86.33%, 91.57%(>1.0 cm group), respectively. C-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive value in the determination of malignant nodules in both groups compared to the other two kinds of TIRADS. Conclusions: The three kinds of TIRADS all have high diagnostic performance for the determination of the malignant nodules, and the C-TIRADS has the best overall efficacy, which can effectively assist clinicians for medical decision, and is worth to be popularized and applied in the clinical setting.