Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
Published on: November 15, 2014
Choosing Wisely: An idea worth sustaining
Monika Kastner1,2, Julie Makarski1, Kathryn Mossman1
1Knowledge Translation and Implementation, Centre for Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objectives:
To evaluate the sustainability potential of Choosing Wisely (CW) to address unnecessary medical care at Ontario community hospitals.
Data Sources/Study Setting:
Ontario community hospitals and their affiliated family health teams (FHTs).
Study Design:
A mixed-methods study involving the administration of a validated sustainability survey to CW implementation teams followed by their participation in focus groups.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods:
Survey data were collected using an Excel file with an embedded, automated scoring system. We collated individual survey scores and generated aggregate team scores. We also performed descriptive statistics for quantitative data (frequencies, means). Qualitative data were triangulated with quantitative assessments to support data interpretations using the meta-matrix method.
Principal Findings:
Fifteen CW implementation teams across four Ontario community hospitals and six affiliated primary care FHTs participated. CW priority areas investigated were de-prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and reducing Pre-Op testing and BUN/Urea lab testing. Survey results showed steady improvements in sustainability scores from baseline to final follow-up among most implementation teams: 10% increase for PPI de-prescribing (six FHTs) and 2% increase (three hospital teams); 18% increase in BUN/Urea lab testing (three hospital teams). Regardless of site or CW priority area, common facilitators were fit with existing processes and workflows, leadership support, and optimized team communication; common challenges were lack of awareness and buy-in, leadership engagement or a champion, and lack of fit with existing workflow and culture. All teams identified at least one challenge for which they co-designed and implemented a plan to maximize the sustainability potential of their CW initiative.
Conclusions:
Evaluating the sustainability potential of an innovation such as Choosing Wisely is critical to ensuring that they have the best potential for impact. Our work highlights that implementation teams can be empowered to influence implementation efforts and to realize positive outcomes for their health care services and patients.
Related Concept Videos
Social Exchange Theory
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Growth versus Fixed Mindset
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Self-Discrepancy Theory

