Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Secondary Prophylaxis of Gastric Variceal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Karim T Osman1, Tarek Nayfeh, Ahmed M Abdelfattah
1Department of Internal Medicine Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Clinic Burlington MA Evidence-Based Practice Center Mayo Clinic Rochester MN Division of Gastroenterology Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Clinic Burlington MA Department of MedicineDivision of Gastroenterology University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester MA Department of Internal Medicine Lincoln Medical Center Bronx NY Department of Internal MedicineWertachklinik Schwabmünchen Bavaria Germany Department of Internal Medicine University of Alexandria Alexandria Egypt Department of Internal Medicine Damascus University Damascus Syria Department of Library Services Mayo Clinic Rochester MN Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Diseases Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Health Burlington MA.
None:
There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal approach for secondary prophylaxis of gastric variceal bleeding (GVB) in patients with cirrhosis. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of available treatments. A comprehensive search of several databases from each database's inception to March 23, 2021, was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes of interest were rebleeding and mortality. Results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. We included 9 RCTs with 647 patients who had histories of GVB and follow-ups >6 weeks. A total of 9 interventions were included in the NMA. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) was associated with a lower risk of rebleeding when compared with β-blockers (RR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.26; low certainty), and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS)-cyanoacrylate (CYA) (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77; low certainty). β-blockers were associated with a higher risk of rebleeding compared with most interventions and with increased mortality compared with EIS-CYA (RR, 4.12, 95% CI, 1.50-11.36; low certainty), and EIS-CYA + nonselective β-blockers (RR, 5.61; 95% CI, 1.91-16.43; low certainty). Analysis based on indirect comparisons suggests that BRTO may be the best intervention in preventing rebleeding, whereas β-blocker monotherapy is likely the worst in preventing rebleeding and mortality. Head-to-head RCTs are needed to validate these results.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care

