Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.5K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.5K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

756
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
756
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

10.3K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
10.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

13.8K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
13.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

5.2K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
5.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Score Trends in Clinical Science Subject Exams: A Longitudinal Study.

Medical science educator·2026
Same author

Are Physicians' USMLE Scores Associated With Patient Mortality? A Multilevel Modeling Approach to USMLE Predictive Validity Evidence.

Health science reports·2025
Same author

Building a Validity Argument for a New Clinical Reasoning Item Format: A Think-Aloud Interview Study of SHARP Item Response Processes.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2025
Same author

Better understanding the clinical reasoning skills of 4th-year medical students through think aloud interviews: implications for theory and practice.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2025
Same author

Using large language models (LLMs) to apply analytic rubrics to score post-encounter notes.

Medical teacher·2025
Same author

YAP/TAZ signaling in allantois-derived cells is required for placental vascularization.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

babebi: An R Package for Bayesian Estimation and Validation in Small-N Two-Rater Pre-Post Designs.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

A Tool for Agreement and Alignment Analysis in Binary Rating Tasks: The R Package scindex.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

The EM Algorithm and Its Variants in Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Comparing Their Propensity for Boundaries, Extremes, Convergence, and Suboptimal Solutions.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

When Perceptions of Social Desirability Differ: Implications for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model of Faking.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

csemGT: An R Package for Estimating Raw-Score Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement in Generalizability Theory.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Adaptive Quadrature Estimator Using Four Link Functions.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 11, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Cut-Score Operating Function Extensions: Penalty-Based Errors and Uncertainty in Standard Settings.

Irina Grabovsky1, Jesse Pace2, Christopher Runyon3

  • 1Psychometrics and Data Analysis, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Applied Psychological Measurement
|December 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a systematic tool using cut-score operating functions to minimize errors in pass/fail examinations. It optimizes cut-scores by considering examinee ability distributions and standard-setting uncertainty for better classification accuracy.

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.0K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.0K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Minimizing classification errors is crucial in pass/fail examinations.
  • Standard setting involves determining the cut-score for test results.
  • Examinee ability and standard-setting uncertainty impact classification accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a systematic tool for minimizing classification errors in pass/fail examinations.
  • To examine the influence of examinee ability distributions and standard-setting uncertainty on optimal cut-score selection.
  • To introduce an online application for utilizing cut-score operating functions in standard settings.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling pass/fail examinations using cut-score operating functions.
  • Generating specific cut-scores by minimizing misclassification measures.
  • Analyzing the combined effects of known examinee ability distributions and standard-setting uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • The study provides a method to systematically determine optimal cut-scores.
  • It quantifies the impact of examinee ability and standard-setting uncertainty on cut-score choice.
  • An online application is presented for practical use in standard settings.

Conclusions:

  • The cut-score operating function offers a robust tool for optimizing pass/fail examination standards.
  • Understanding the interplay between examinee ability and standard-setting uncertainty is key to reducing misclassification.
  • The developed online application facilitates the application of these methods in diverse educational and professional testing contexts.