Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

False Memories01:18

False Memories

171
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
171
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

15
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
15
Problem-Solving01:29

Problem-Solving

275
Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
275
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

173
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
173
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

23
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
23
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

46.2K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
46.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The persuasive potential of AI-paraphrased information at scale.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

The benefits and dangers of anthropomorphic conversational agents.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

American academic freedom is in peril.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Followback Clusters, Satellite Audiences, and Bridge Nodes: Coengagement Networks for the 2020 US Election.

Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media·2024
Same author

Perceived experts are prevalent and influential within an antivaccine community on Twitter.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same journal

Taphonomic analysis at Liang Bua reveals the behavioral and technological capabilities of <i>Homo floresiensis</i>.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Targeting granule initiation and amyloplast structure to create giant starch granules in wheat.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

A meta-analysis of carbon losses and gains from tropical moist forest degradation and regeneration.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Ancient DNA reveals elite dynastic rule among Iron Age Eurasian Steppe nomads.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Targeting astrocytic Dp71 attenuates BBB disruption after traumatic brain injury through WTAP-associated m<sup>6</sup>A regulation of MMP2.

Science advances·2026
Same journal

Pancreatic α cells are required for nutrient homeostasis by regulating dynamic β cell networks in islets.

Science advances·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.5K

How do you solve a problem like misinformation?

Ryan Calo1, Chris Coward2, Emma S Spiro2

  • 1School of Law, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Science Advances
|December 8, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Distinguishing misinformation from disinformation and speech from action is crucial for improving online communication. Understanding these differences can guide better research and policy development.

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.7K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.5K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.7K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Communication Studies
  • Social Sciences
  • Digital Ethics

Background:

  • Online communication is increasingly complex, with terms like misinformation and disinformation often used interchangeably.
  • The distinction between online speech and harmful action requires careful consideration.
  • Mistaken beliefs and deeply held convictions present unique challenges in addressing problematic online content.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the semantic and practical differences between misinformation and disinformation.
  • To differentiate between online speech and actionable behaviors.
  • To explore the nuances between mistaken beliefs and firm convictions in the context of online discourse.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of key terminology.
  • Literature review of relevant research in communication, psychology, and policy.
  • Framework development for distinguishing related concepts.

Main Results:

  • Misinformation is false information spread regardless of intent; disinformation is false information spread with intent to deceive.
  • Speech is protected expression, while action involves conduct with potential real-world consequences.
  • Mistaken beliefs may be corrected with evidence, while convictions are resistant to change.

Conclusions:

  • Clearer definitions of misinformation, disinformation, speech, and action are essential for targeted interventions.
  • Recognizing the spectrum from belief to conviction informs strategies for online content moderation and user education.
  • This nuanced understanding can foster more effective research and policy for healthier online communication environments.