Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FlowMol3: flow matching for 3D <i>de novo</i> small-molecule generation.

Digital discovery·2026
Same author

A Cationic Amphiphilic Drug (CAD) Defense System in the Nematode <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

GEOM-drugs revisited: toward more chemically accurate benchmarks for 3D molecule generation.

Digital discovery·2025
Same author

Sliding Window Interaction Grammar (SWING): a generalized interaction language model for peptide and protein interactions.

Nature methods·2025
Same author

CACHE Challenge #2: Targeting the RNA Site of the SARS-CoV-2 Helicase Nsp13.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

CACHE Challenge #1: Docking with GNINA Is All You Need.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2024
Same journal

Correction: Chen et al. Chemical Composition of <i>Litsea pungens</i> Essential Oil and Its Potential Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities. <i>Molecules</i> 2023, <i>28</i>, 6835.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correction: Ruan et al. Comparison of Extraction, Isolation, Purification, Structural Characterization and Immunomodulatory Activity of Polysaccharides from Two Species of <i>Cistanche</i>. <i>Molecules</i> 2025, <i>30</i>, 4754.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correction: Li et al. Gastrodin Ameliorates Cognitive Dysfunction in Vascular Dementia Rats by Suppressing Ferroptosis via the Regulation of the Nrf2/Keap1-GPx4 Signaling Pathway. <i>Molecules</i> 2022, <i>27</i>, 6311.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Correction: Zueva et al. Steady-State Kinetics of Enzyme-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Echothiophate, a P-S Bonded Organophosphorus as Monitored by Spectrofluorimetry. <i>Molecules</i> 2020, <i>25</i>, 1371.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

1,4-Diazatriphenylene and Its Hetero-Fused Analogs: Synthesis and Applications.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Comparative Phytochemical Studies on the Aerial Parts of <i>Teucrium davaeanum</i> Coss. and <i>Teucrium zanonii</i> Pamp.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells
09:05

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells

Published on: September 4, 2019

22.4K

Virtual Screening with Gnina 1.0.

Jocelyn Sunseri1, David Ryan Koes1

  • 1Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gnina, a new deep learning software for virtual screening, shows improved performance over traditional methods in drug discovery. However, dataset biases may affect how accurately machine learning models interpret molecular interactions.

Keywords:
deep learningmolecular dockingstructure-based drug designvirtual screening

More Related Videos

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

3.5K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells
09:05

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells

Published on: September 4, 2019

22.4K
NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

3.5K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Virtual screening is crucial for drug discovery, aiming to identify compounds that bind to target molecules.
  • Current virtual screening methods balance speed and accuracy, but may miss critical drug usability factors.
  • Deep convolutional networks offer a novel approach to scoring protein-ligand interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the virtual screening performance of the Gnina molecular docking software.
  • To compare Gnina's deep learning approach against conventional empirical scoring methods.
  • To investigate potential biases in benchmark datasets affecting machine learning model evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Gnina, a deep learning-based molecular docking software, for virtual screening.
  • Assessed Gnina's performance on the DUD-E and LIT-PCBA virtual screening benchmarks.
  • Compared Gnina's scoring function against the empirical AutoDock Vina scoring function.

Main Results:

  • Gnina demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional empirical scoring on average.
  • Gnina's default scoring outperformed AutoDock Vina on 89 out of 117 targets.
  • A significant median 1% early enrichment factor was observed for Gnina, more than double that of Vina.
  • Dataset biases were identified, potentially influencing the interpretation of machine learning model performance.

Conclusions:

  • Gnina represents a significant advancement in virtual screening accuracy for drug discovery.
  • The study highlights the need to address dataset biases for reliable machine learning model assessment.
  • Further research is warranted to understand the impact of bias on deep learning in computational chemistry.