Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
Published on: March 19, 2021
Evaluation of Android and Apple Store Depression Applications Based on Mobile Application Rating Scale
Jaime Martín-Martín1,2, Antonio Muro-Culebras2,3, Cristina Roldán-Jiménez2,3
1Department of Human Anatomy, Legal Medicine and History of Science, University of Málaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain.
Mobile health apps for depression show potential but lack standard quality control. This study used the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) to evaluate 30 depression apps, finding average quality but uneven scores across features.
Area of Science:
- Digital health
- Mental health technology
- Mobile health (mHealth) applications
Background:
- Numerous mobile applications exist for health monitoring, yet their quality is often subjectively assessed by users.
- A lack of standardized evaluation criteria hinders the assessment of mobile health application quality, particularly for mental health conditions.
- Depression management apps are increasingly prevalent, necessitating objective quality assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the quality of mobile applications designed for depression symptom monitoring and management.
- To analyze depression-related mobile applications using the established Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive search for depression management apps was conducted across the Apple App Store and Android Play Store in Spain and the UK.
- Two independent reviewers utilized a blind methodology to assess 30 selected applications (18 Android, 12 iOS) between September and October 2019.
- The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), with scores from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent), was employed for quality evaluation.
Main Results:
- The overall average quality score for the evaluated depression applications was 3.67 ± 0.53 on the MARS scale.
- The 'Functionality' (4.51) and 'Esthetics' (3.98) sections received the highest average scores.
- The 'Application Subjective Quality' (2.86) and 'Information' (3.08) sections scored the lowest, indicating areas for improvement.
Conclusions:
- Mobile Health applications for depression management hold significant potential for user health impact.
- Current mobile applications for depression enter the market without rigorous health-specific quality control.
- Standardized evaluation tools like MARS are crucial for assessing and improving the quality of mental health applications.
Related Concept Videos
Depression: Overview
Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Long-term Depression

