Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025
Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Rescue of Failed Aortic Repair with Fenestrated Endovascular Device
Aoife Kiernan1, Mohamed Elsherif1, Brian Fahey1
1St James's Vascular Institute, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Introduction:
The incidence of failed endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OR) is increasing. Redo aortic repair is required in 10% of patients. Extension of the proximal sealing zone above the visceral arteries to adequate, healthier thoracic aorta using a fenestrated graft (FEVAR) can rescue a failing repair. A custom-made device can treat proximal type 1a endoleaks or proximal dilatation post endovascular or open repair, respectively. The aim of this investigation was to present a single-centre experience with FEVAR for patients with a failing aortic repair.
Methods:
A prospectively maintained database of FEVAR patients treated with a ZenithⓇ Fenestrated endovascular (ZFEN) device (Cook Medical LLC, Bloomington, Indiana, USA) was interrogated for individuals who had the device implanted as a rescue therapy after prior endovascular (EVAR) or open repair (OR). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v 25 software.
Results:
Between January 1, 2011 and March 31, 2019, 17 ZFEN devices were implanted. 10 patients had a type 1a endoleak from a prior EVAR and 7 patients had proximal disease progression after prior OR. There were 12 males and 5 females, median age of 75 (interquartile range, IQR 7). 76.4% (n = 13) of patients had an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade of 3. Primary technical success was 70.5% (n = 12). Of the remainder, 4 cases (24%) had a type III endoleak at completion angiogram; of which, 2 patients (12%) required re-intervention within 30 days. One further case (6%) had primary assisted technical success as stenting of a flow limiting dissection flap in an iliac vessel was required. Peri-operative rate of deployment related complications and systemic complications were 5.8% (n = 1) and 35% (n = 6), respectively. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (IQR 11). There was no mortality within the study follow up. Overall 30-day re-intervention rate was 23.5%. Overall survival was 92% at one year.
Conclusion:
FEVAR is a safe but technically challenging option for rescue of failing aortic repairs. These are a high-risk group of patients and this is reflected in the high post-operative morbidity rate. Technical success was high and 30-day mortality was low.
