Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.4K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.4K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

48.1K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
48.1K
Phylogeny01:23

Phylogeny

54.3K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
54.3K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.5K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.5K
The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes02:40

The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes

35.6K
The “tree of life” describes the evolution of life and the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The root of the tree is the common ancestor to all life on Earth. All other species radiate from this point, much like the branches of a tree. The numerous tips of these branches on the tree of life represent every living, or extant, species. Extinct species, which are species that no longer exist, can be found towards the center of the tree. Currently, these organisms, both...
35.6K
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

14.4K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
14.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The name of the game: palaeoproteomics and radiocarbon dates further refine the presence and dispersal of caprines in eastern and southern Africa.

Royal Society open science·2023
Same author

THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROBOSCIDEA: HOW MANY CLADISTIC CLASSIFICATIONS?

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

CHARACTERS, OBSERVATIONS AND STEPS: COMMENT ON LIPSCOMB'S "PARSIMONY, HOMOLOGY AND THE ANALYSIS OF MULTISTATE CHARACTERS" VÉRONIQUE BARRIEL.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

Cladistic coding of genomic maps.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

Phylogeny of fossil and extant glypheid and litogastrid lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda) as revealed by morphological characters.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2021
Same author

Molecular phylogeny of 42 species of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) from three continents.

Parasite (Paris, France)·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.1K

Rooting with Multiple Outgroups: Consensus Versus Parsimony.

Véronique Barriel1,2, Pascal Tassy3

  • 1URA 9948 CNRS, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.

Cladistics : the International Journal of the Willi Hennig Society
|December 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Rooting phylogenetic trees with multiple outgroups can yield conflicting results, affecting basal branching patterns. Using a strict consensus of equally parsimonious trees offers a robust alternative to selecting a single prime outgroup.

More Related Videos

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.5K
A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

292

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.1K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.5K
A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

292

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics
  • Systematics
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Phylogenetic trees are commonly rooted using outgroup(s) to infer evolutionary relationships and test ingroup monophyly.
  • Unconstrained simultaneous analysis with multiple outgroups is favored for its potential to rigorously test ingroup monophyly.

Discussion:

  • Contradictory outgroup data can lead to unstable basal node resolution in rooted trees.
  • The order of outgroups in the data matrix, specifically the prime outgroup, can arbitrarily influence tree topology, even with exhaustive searches.
  • Permuting prime outgroups can result in different, equally parsimonious rooted trees (cladograms).

Key Insights:

  • Selecting a single outgroup to root a tree introduces an assumption that may not reflect true evolutionary history.
  • The strict consensus of multiple equally parsimonious rooted trees provides a less assumption-laden alternative for tree rooting.
  • This consensus approach avoids the arbitrary choice of a prime outgroup but may result in a less resolved tree.

Outlook:

  • Future phylogenetic analyses should consider consensus methods to mitigate biases from outgroup selection.
  • Further research into robust methods for resolving basal relationships in the presence of conflicting outgroup data is warranted.
  • Developing standardized protocols for outgroup selection and tree rooting could enhance phylogenetic reproducibility.