Effect of dual-convolutional neural network model fusion for Aluminum profile surface defects classification and...

Classifying and identifying surface defects is essential during the production and use of aluminum profiles. Recently, the dual-convolutional neural network(CNN) model fusion framework has shown promising performance for defects classification and recognition. Spurred by this trend, this paper proposes an improved dual-CNN model fusion framework to classify and identify defects in aluminum profiles. Compared with traditional dual-CNN model fusion frameworks, the proposed architecture involves an improved fusion layer, fusion strategy, and classifier block. Specifically, the suggested method extracts the feature map of the aluminum profile RGB image from the pre-trained VGG16 model's pool5 layer and the feature map of the maximum pooling layer of the suggested A4 network, which is added after the Alexnet model. then, weighted bilinear interpolation unsamples the feature maps extracted from the maximum pooling layer of the A4 part. The network layer and upsampling schemes ensure equal feature map dimensions ensuring feature map merging utilizing an improved wavelet transform. Finally, global average pooling is employed in the classifier block instead of dense layers to reduce the model's parameters and avoid overfitting. The fused feature map is then input into the classifier block for classification. The experimental setup involves data augmentation and transfer learning to prevent overfitting due to the small-sized data sets exploited, while the K cross-validation method is employed to evaluate the model's performance during the training process. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed dual-CNN model fusion framework attains a classification accuracy higher than current techniques, and specifically 4.3% higher than Alexnet, 2.5% for VGG16, 2.9% for Inception v3, 2.2% for VGG19, 3.6% for Resnet50, 3% for Resnet101, and 0.7% and 1.2% than the conventional dual-CNN fusion framework 1 and 2, respectively, proving the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.