Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

21
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
21
Diamagnetic Shielding of Nuclei: Local Diamagnetic Current01:14

Diamagnetic Shielding of Nuclei: Local Diamagnetic Current

1.0K
An applied magnetic field causes the electrons present in the molecule to circulate, setting up a local diamagnetic current within the molecule. The local diamagnetic current arising from circulating sigma-bonding electrons induces a magnetic field, Blocal that opposes the applied magnetic field, B0. The effective magnetic field experienced by these nuclei is given by the difference between the applied and local magnetic fields in a phenomenon called local diamagnetic shielding. Essentially,...
1.0K
Ampere-Maxwell's Law: Problem-Solving01:17

Ampere-Maxwell's Law: Problem-Solving

816
A parallel-plate capacitor with capacitance C, whose plates have area A and separation distance d, is connected to a resistor R and a battery of voltage V. The current starts to flow at t = 0. What is the displacement current between the capacitor plates at time t? From the properties of the capacitor, what is the corresponding real current?
To solve the problem, we can use the equations from the analysis of an RC circuit and Maxwell's version of Ampère's law.
For the first part of...
816
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

350
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
350
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Propagation Speed of Electromagnetic Waves01:30

Propagation Speed of Electromagnetic Waves

4.1K
Electromagnetic waves are consistent with Ampere's law. Assuming there is no conduction current Ampere's law is given as:
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regulating Electrostatic Discharge via Quasi-gate Electrode for High-Performance Direct-current Triboelectric Nanogenerators.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Transcriptomics and Mendelian randomization studies reveal the critical role of Stanniocalcin-2 in linking perfluorinated compound-exposure to colorectal cancer.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Boon or a bane: Different usage of LLM correlates with mental health.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

The lignin fluorescence at the base of the petals guiding the pollinators to the pollination chamber in Artabotrys hainanensis.

BMC plant biology·2026
Same author

Macro-Dipole-Constrained Learning of Atomic Charges for Accurate Electrostatic Potentials at Electrochemical Interfaces.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

In Situ EC-EPR Spectroscopy and DFT Analysis of H<sub>UPD</sub> on Polycrystalline Pt.

ChemSusChem·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Using relative-speed-of-processing to explain the shielding function of task rules.

Liang Huang1,2, Bingxin Li3, Panjie Yan2,4

  • 1School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|December 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Applying task rules in reaction tests enhances target processing speed, which shields against distractor interference. This shielding effect is explained by the relative-speed-of-processing theory, not direct rule application.

Keywords:
Shielding functioncognitive controlhorse-race model

More Related Videos

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.3K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

46.3K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Choice reaction tests (CRT) often involve distractors that impair performance.
  • Applying task rules is thought to shield against distractor interference, but the underlying mechanism is unclear.
  • The relative-speed-of-processing theory offers a potential explanation for shielding effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanism by which applying task rules shields against distractor interference in CRTs.
  • To test the predictions of the relative-speed-of-processing theory regarding distractor interference.
  • To determine if task rule application directly or indirectly reduces interference.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using choice reaction tests.
  • Methods included manipulating task rule application (rules vs. associative responding).
  • Temporal sequences of target and distractor presentation were varied, and processing speeds were directly manipulated.

Main Results:

  • Applying task rules facilitated target processing speed, reducing the distractor's relative processing advantage and eliminating interference (Experiment 1A).
  • When distractor processing advantage was high, task rules did not prevent interference; when low, interference was absent even without rules (Experiments 1B, 1C).
  • Contrary to expectations, participants applying task rules showed interference when target processing was not facilitated, while associative responders did not (Experiment 2).

Conclusions:

  • Applying task rules does not directly shield against interference.
  • Task rule application indirectly shields by enhancing target processing speed.
  • This speed enhancement reduces the distractor's relative processing advantage, thereby mitigating interference effects.