Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
A number-line task with a Bayesian active learning algorithm provides insights into the development of non-symbolic
Sang Ho Lee1, Dan Kim2, John E Opfer2
1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 212 Psychology Building, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. lee.7285@osu.edu.
Symbolic and non-symbolic number estimation share common processes and developmental pathways. This study found that non-symbolic number estimation mirrors symbolic estimation across a wide age range.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Numerical Cognition
Background:
- The number-line task is a key method for understanding numerical representations.
- A central debate concerns whether symbolic (e.g., numerals) and non-symbolic (e.g., dots) number processing share underlying mechanisms.
- Existing research primarily focuses on symbolic number processing, leaving the non-symbolic domain less explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if established findings from symbolic number-line estimation generalize to non-symbolic number-line estimation.
- To determine if numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic quantities develop through common pathways.
- To explore numerical cognition across a broad age spectrum (5-73 years).
Main Methods:
- Utilized a number-line task to assess participants' estimation of numerical quantities.
- Applied a novel Bayesian active learning algorithm, Gaussian process active learning (GPAL), for efficient experimental design.
- Collected data from a diverse sample of 238 participants aged 5 to 73 years.
Main Results:
- Non-symbolic number estimation demonstrated three characteristic features previously observed in symbolic number estimation.
- These findings suggest a shared underlying representational system for both symbolic and non-symbolic numbers.
- The observed patterns held across a wide range of ages, indicating developmental continuity.
Conclusions:
- Symbolic and non-symbolic number representations appear to rely on common cognitive processes.
- The developmental trajectory for understanding numbers is likely shared, regardless of the format (symbolic vs. non-symbolic).
- This research provides strong evidence for a unified system of numerical representation.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Learning
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

