Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025
Confocal Time Lapse Imaging as an Efficient Method for the Cytocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Composites
Published on: November 9, 2014
In Vitro Biocompatibility of CPP-ACP and Fluoride-containing Desensitizers on Human Gingival Cells
S López-García1, J Guerrero-Gironés2, M P Pecci-Lloret3
1Sergio López-García BS, PhD, School of Dentistry/Cellular Therapy and Hematopoietic Transplant Unit, Hematology Department, Virgen de la Arrixaca Clinical University Hospital, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Objectives:
To analyze the biocompatibility of different desensitizers containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and fluoride in their composition: MI Varnish (MV), Clinpro White Varnish (3M Oral Care), Profluorid Varnish (VOCO), Duraphat (Colgate) and Embrace Varnish (Pulpdent) on human gingival fibroblast cells (hGF).
Methods And Materials:
Human gingival fibroblast (hGF) cells were exposed to several desensitizer extracts at different concentrations (0.1%, 1%, and 4% eluates). Then, in vitro biocompatibility was studied by analyzing the IC50 value, cell proliferation (MTT assay and cell cycle), cell migration (wound healing assay), cell morphology and F-actin content (immunocytofluorescence), and induction of apoptosis/necrosis (flow cytometry). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test.
Results:
The lowest cell viability and IC50 were observed in all concentrations of Embrace Varnish-treated hGFs (p<0.001), whereas the highest were exhibited by those treated with Clinpro White Varnish. Similar effects were evidenced when induction of apoptosis/necrosis and cell migration assays were assessed. Finally, MI Varnish, Profluorid Varnish, Duraphat, and Embrace Varnish extracts showed lower numbers of attached cells, some of them with an unusual fibroblastic morphology when cultured with 4% concentration of the varnishes, while Clinpro White Varnish exhibited a similar number of cells with an evident actin cytoskeleton compared to the control group.
Conclusions:
The results obtained in this study indicate that hGFs show better in vitro biocompatibility after exposure to Clinpro White Varnish, even at the highest concentration employed, making it the most eligible for topical applications. In contrast, Embrace Varnish exhibited a high cytotoxicity towards hGFs that could potentially delay the healing process and regeneration of the oral mucosa, although more studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
