A Universal New Definition of Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
Published on: February 18, 2022
Haozhang Huang1,2, Jin Liu1, Min Lei3
1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Insights
Patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) show better outcomes. This study defines HFimpEF and identifies characteristics of patients who experience improved heart function after reduced ejection fraction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Clinical Outcomes
Background:
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a significant clinical challenge.
- The emerging definition of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) requires further characterization.
- Understanding HFimpEF in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe characteristics and outcomes of the new universal definition of HFimpEF.
- To identify predictors of HFimpEF in patients with CAD.
- To compare prognosis between HFimpEF and persistent HFrEF in CAD patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 747 CAD patients with baseline HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%) from a real-world registry (2007-2018).
- HFimpEF defined as LVEF ≤ 40% at baseline with improvement to >40% and a ≥10% increase within 1 year post-discharge.
- Analysis of patient characteristics, comorbidities, treatments, and long-term mortality.
Main Results:
- 35.7% of CAD patients with HFrEF met the HFimpEF criteria.
- HFimpEF patients were younger, more likely to have hypertension, and less likely to have undergone PCI.
- HFimpEF was associated with a lower left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and reduced long-term all-cause mortality (13.1% vs. 20.8%).
Conclusions:
- CAD patients achieving HFimpEF demonstrate a better prognosis than those with persistent HFrEF.
- Predictors for HFimpEF include younger age, fewer comorbidities, and smaller left ventricular end-diastolic diameter.
- The findings support the clinical significance of the HFimpEF definition in CAD management.
Abstract:
Aims: The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics and outcomes of the universal new definition of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) and to identify predictors for HFimpEF among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: CAD subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (EF ≤ 40%) at baseline were enrolled from the real-world registry of the Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt study from January 2007 to December 2018. The new definition of HFimpEF was defined as left ventricular EF (LVEF) of≤40% at baseline and with improvement of up to 40% and at least a ≥ 10% increase during 1 month to 1 year after discharge. Results: Of the 747 CAD patients with HFrEF (86.7% males, mean age: 61.4 ± 11 years), 267 (35.7%) patients conformed to the new HFimpEF definition. Patients with HFimpEF were younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98 [0.97-0.99]) and had a higher rate of hypertension (aOR:1.43 [1.04-1.98]), lower rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment at the time of detection of HFrEF (aOR: 0.48 [0.34-0.69]), history of PCI (aOR: 0.51 [0.28-0.88]), history of acute myocardial infarction (aOR: 0.40 [0.21-0.70]), and lower left ventricular end diastolic diameter (aOR: 0.92 [0.90-0.95]). During 3.3-year follow-up, patients with HFimpEF demonstrated lower rates of long-term all-cause mortality (13.1% vs. 20.8%, aHR: 0.61[0.41-0.90]). Conclusion: In our study, CAD patients with HFimpEF achieved a better prognosis compared to those with persistent HFrEF. Patients with CAD meeting the criteria for the universal definition of HFimpEF tended to be younger, presented fewer clinical comorbidities, and had lower left ventricular end diastolic diameter.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions

