High-resolution manometry in the elderly: patterns of functional dysphagia, achalasia subtypes, and clinical predictors
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
Published on: August 11, 2023
Deepanjan Dey1, Rahul Manral1, Manish Manrai2
1Department of Physiology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.
Background:
Dysphagia in the elderly is often attributed to ageing without objective functional testing. We describe high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics and esophageal motility disorder (EMD) classification in a consecutive geriatric cohort to inform referral and management.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study we enrolled 176 consecutive patients aged >65 years presenting with esophageal dysphagia. Exclusions: structural lesions, mixed oropharyngeal dysphagia, recent proton pump inhibitor use, systemic sclerosis and Katz Activities of Daily Living < 6. HRM was performed and swallows classified per Chicago Classification v4.0. We report descriptive HRM metrics using logistic regression to identify independent predictors of normal HRM versus EMD.
Results:
Normal HRM was present in 57/176 (32.4%). Achalasia (44/176; 25%) and absent contractility (36/176; 20.5%) were the commonest EMDs; type II achalasia predominated. Median basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure were lower in the normal-HRM group (15.3 ± 6.7 mmHg and 6.0 ± 4.0 mmHg) than in patients with EMDs (20.5 ± 23.5 mmHg and 11.0 ± 12.9 mmHg). On multivariable analysis, male sex and younger geriatric age band (66-70 years) were independently associated with EMD while Katz ADL and symptom duration were not. Correlations between age and continuous HRM metrics were weak.
Conclusions:
One-third of symptomatic older adults had normal contraction metrics on HRM; achalasia and absent contractility accounted for most pathologic findings. These data support early functional testing rather than attributing dysphagia to ageing alone. Prospective multimodal studies (panometry/impedance) are recommended to evaluate noncontractile mechanisms and refine referral algorithms.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Achalasia
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
