Feasibility and Effect of Physiological-Based CPAP in Preterm Infants at Birth

Tessa Martherus1, Kristel L A M Kuypers1, Stefan Böhringer2

  • 1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Frontiers in Pediatrics
|December 20, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Physiological-based (PB)-CPAP in preterm infants shows feasibility, increasing heart rate and shortening ventilation time. However, achieving target oxygen saturation and adapting the protocol presented challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Respiratory Physiology
  • Pediatric Critical Care

Background:

  • Preterm infants often receive 5-8 cmH2O Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP).
  • Animal studies suggest higher initial CPAP levels (12-15 cmH2O) followed by reduction (PB-CPAP) may enhance lung aeration without compromising cardiovascular function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of implementing a physiological-based CPAP (PB-CPAP) protocol in preterm infants at birth.
  • To evaluate the effects of PB-CPAP compared to standard CPAP on physiological parameters and short-term outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized trial involving preterm infants (24-30 weeks gestation) comparing PB-CPAP with standard 5-8 cmH2O CPAP for the initial 10 minutes post-birth.
  • PB-CPAP involved starting at 15 cmH2O and gradually decreasing to 8 cmH2O upon infant stabilization (heart rate ≥100 bpm, SpO2 ≥85%, FiO2 ≤0.4, spontaneous breathing).
  • Primary outcomes included feasibility and SpO2 within the first 5 minutes; secondary outcomes covered physiological parameters and neonatal outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The study was halted early with 28 infants analyzed (PB-CPAP n=8, standard CPAP n=20) due to low recruitment and guideline changes.
  • While SpO2 levels in the first 5 minutes were not significantly different, PB-CPAP infants showed higher heart rates (p=0.016) and reduced mask ventilation duration (p=0.020).
  • Caregivers found the PB-CPAP protocol difficult to execute, and protocol deviations occurred in both groups, indicating challenges in tailoring CPAP levels.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing PB-CPAP in preterm infants is feasible but presents practical challenges in protocol adherence and adjustment.
  • PB-CPAP demonstrated potential benefits by increasing heart rate and shortening ventilation duration, possibly indicating improved lung aeration.
  • Further research is needed to refine PB-CPAP protocols for easier clinical application and to confirm its long-term benefits.