Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

A Recovery Cardiopulmonary Bypass Model Without Transfusion or Inotropic Agents in Rats
Published on: March 23, 2018
ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 Are Not Predictive of Organ Dysfunction After Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Sheng Zhang1, Dan Zheng1, Xiao-Qiong Chu1
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China.
Insights
Carbon dioxide (CO2)-derived variables like venous-to-arterial CO2 difference (ΔPCO2) are not reliable predictors of organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Base excess (BE) showed better predictive performance in patients with multiple organ failures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Critical Care Physiology
Background:
- Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) carries a significant risk of major adverse events and organ dysfunction.
- Carbon dioxide (CO2)-derived variables, including venous-to-arterial CO2 difference (ΔPCO2) and the ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 ratio, are established prognostic markers in non-cardiac surgery.
- The utility of these CO2-derived variables in predicting outcomes specifically after CPB remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic value of ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 in predicting organ dysfunction 48 hours after cardiac surgery with CPB.
- To compare the predictive performance of CO2-derived variables with other physiological markers like lactate and Base Excess (BE).
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 114 intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB.
- Classification of patients into organ dysfunction (OI) and non-organ dysfunction (n-OI) groups based on organ function at 48 hours post-CPB.
- Measurement and analysis of ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 at ICU admission and at 4, 8, and 12 hours post-admission.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found in ΔPCO2 or ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 between the OI and n-OI groups during the first 12 hours post-ICU admission.
- Subgroup analysis revealed that lactate and Base Excess (BE) had improved predictive performance for multiple organ failures compared to ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2.
- Regression analysis identified BE at 8 hours post-admission as a significant risk factor for organ dysfunction at 48 hours post-CPB (OR = 1.37, P = 0.009).
Conclusions:
- ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 are not reliable indicators for predicting 48-hour organ dysfunction following CPB.
- The complex pathophysiological changes after CPB may limit the predictive capacity of these specific CO2-derived variables.
- Base Excess (BE) emerges as a more promising marker for risk stratification in post-cardiac surgery patients.
Abstract:
Background: Cardiac surgery is associated with a substantial risk of major adverse events. Although carbon dioxide (CO2)-derived variables such as venous-to-arterial CO2 difference (ΔPCO2), and PCO2 gap to arterial-venous O2 content difference ratio (ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2) have been successfully used to predict the prognosis of non-cardiac surgery, their prognostic value after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains controversial. This hospital-based study explored the relationship between ΔPCO2, ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 and organ dysfunction after CPB. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 114 intensive care unit patients after elective cardiac surgery with CPB. Patients were divided into the organ dysfunction group (OI) and non-organ dysfunction group (n-OI) depending on whether organ dysfunction occurred or not at 48 h after CPB. ΔPCO2 was defined as the difference between central venous and arterial CO2 partial pressure. Results: The OI group has 37 (32.5%) patients, 27 of which (23.7%) had one organ dysfunction and 10 (8.8%) had two or more organ dysfunctions. No statistical significance was found (P = 0.84) for ΔPCO2 in the n-OI group at intensive care unit (ICU) admission (9.0, 7.0-11.0 mmHg), and at 4 (9.0, 7.0-11.0 mmHg), 8 (9.0, 7.0-11.0 mmHg), and 12 h post admission (9.0, 7.0-11.0 mmHg). In the OI group, ΔPCO2 also showed the same trend [ICU admission (9.0, 8.0-12.8 mmHg) and 4 (10.0, 7.0-11.0 mmHg), 8 (10.0, 8.5-12.5 mmHg), and 12 h post admission (9.0, 7.3-11.0 mmHg), P = 0.37]. No statistical difference was found for ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 in the n-OI group (P = 0.46) and OI group (P = 0.39). No difference was detected in ΔPCO2, ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 between groups during the first 12 h after admission (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis of the patients with two or more failing organs compared to the n-OI group showed that the predictive performance of lactate and Base excess (BE) improved, but not of ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2. Regression analysis showed that the BE at 8 h after admission (odds ratio = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.08-1.74, P = 0.009) was a risk factor for organ dysfunction 48 h after CBP. Conclusion : ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2/C(a-cv)O2 cannot be used as reliable indicators to predict the occurrence of organ dysfunction at 48 h after CBP due to the pathophysiological process that occurs after CBP.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...

