Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Quantitative Visualization of Leukocyte Infiltrate in a Murine Model of Fulminant Myocarditis by Light Sheet Microscopy
Published on: May 31, 2017
Fulminant Giant Cell Myocarditis vs. Lymphocytic Myocarditis: A Comparison of Their Clinical Characteristics,
Yuxiao Hu1, Jie Ren2, Xueqi Dong1
1Emergency and Critical Care Center, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases of China, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Insights
Fulminant giant cell myocarditis (FGCM) patients show milder inflammation and myocardial damage but a poorer prognosis than fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM) patients. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels can differentiate between FGCM and FLM and predict outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Immunology
- Pathology
Background:
- Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a severe, rapidly progressing, and often fatal cardiac condition that poses classification challenges.
- Distinguishing between different subtypes of FM is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and patient outcomes in individuals diagnosed with fulminant giant cell myocarditis (FGCM) versus fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM).
- To identify potential biomarkers for differentiating FGCM from FLM and predicting prognosis in FM patients.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 16 patients (9 FGCM, 7 FLM) diagnosed via histology over an 11-year period.
- Comparison of clinical data, laboratory markers (including hs-CRP, CK-MB, ALT), echocardiographic parameters (RVEDD), and treatment interventions (IABP, ECMO).
- Multivariate Cox regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to assess prognostic factors and diagnostic accuracy.
Main Results:
- FGCM patients exhibited significantly lower levels of hs-CRP, CK-MB, and ALT, and a greater RVEDD compared to FLM patients.
- Despite similar rates of mechanical circulatory support use, FGCM patients had a significantly lower long-term survival rate (0% vs. 71.4%).
- Elevated hs-CRP levels were identified as an independent negative prognostic factor for FM, with an AUC of 0.94 for differentiating FGCM and FLM.
Conclusions:
- The inflammatory response and myocardial injury are less pronounced in FGCM compared to FLM.
- FGCM is associated with a significantly worse prognosis than FLM.
- hs-CRP serves as a potential prognostic biomarker for FM and can aid in differentiating between FGCM and FLM, with a suggested cutoff of 11.71 mg/L.
Abstract:
Objectives: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a rapidly progressive and frequently fatal form of myocarditis that has been difficult to classify. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes in patients with fulminant giant cell myocarditis (FGCM) and fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM). Methods and Results: In our retrospective study, nine patients with FGCM (mean age 47.9 ± 7.5 years, six female) and 7 FLM (mean age 42.1 ± 12.3 years, four female) patients confirmed by histology in the last 11 years were included. Most patients with FGCM and FLM were NYHA functional class IV (56 vs. 100%, p = 0.132). Patients with FGCM had significantly lower levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP, 4.4 (2.0-10.2) mg/L vs. 13.6 (12.6-14.6) mg/L, P = 0.004, data shown as the median with IQR], creatine kinase-myoglobin [CK-MB, 1.4 (1.0-3.2) ng/ml vs. 14.6 (3.0-64.9) ng/ml, P = 0.025, median with IQR], and alanine aminotransferase [ALT, 38.0 (25.0-61.5) IU/L vs. 997.0 (50.0-3,080.0) IU/L, P = 0.030, median with IQR] and greater right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) [2.9 ± 0.3 cm vs. 2.4 ± 0.6 cm, P = 0.034, mean ± SD] than those with FLM. No differences were observed in the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (44 vs. 43%, p = 1.000) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (11 vs. 43%, p = 0.262) between the two groups. The long-term survival rate was significantly lower in FGCM group compared with FLM group (0 vs. 71.4%, p = 0.022). A multivariate cox regression analysis showed the level of hs-CRP (hazard ratio = 0.871, 95% confidence interval: 0.761-0.996, P = 0.043) was an independent prognostic factor for FM patients. Furthermore, the level of hs-CRP had a good ability to discriminate between patients with FGCM and FLM (AUC = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.4213-0.9964). Conclusions: The inflammatory response and myocardial damage in the patients with FGCM were milder than those with FLM. Patients with FGCM had distinctly poorer prognoses compared with those with FLM. Our results suggest that hs-CRP could be a promising prognostic biomarker and a hs-CRP level of 11.71 mg/L is an appropriate cutoff point for the differentiating diagnosis between patients with FGCM and FLM.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

