Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
Texture-based probability mapping for automatic scar assessment in late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic
Vidar Frøysa1, Gøran J Berg2, Trygve Eftestøl2
1Department of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Armauer Hansens vei 20, 4011, Stavanger, Norway.
Purpose:
To evaluate a novel texture-based probability mapping (TPM) method for scar size estimation in LGE-CMRI.
Methods:
This retrospective proof-of-concept study included chronic myocardial scars from 52 patients. The TPM was compared with three signal intensity-based methods: manual segmentation, full-width-half-maximum (FWHM), and 5-standard deviation (5-SD). TPM is generated using machine learning techniques, expressing the probability of scarring in pixels. The probability is derived by comparing the texture of the 3 × 3 pixel matrix surrounding each pixel with reference dictionaries from patients with established myocardial scars. The Sørensen-Dice coefficient was used to find the optimal TPM range. A non-parametric test was used to test the correlation between infarct size and remodeling parameters. Bland-Altman plots were performed to assess agreement among the methods.
Results:
The study included 52 patients (76.9% male; median age 64.5 years (54, 72.5)). A TPM range of 0.328-1.0 was found to be the optimal probability interval to predict scar size compared to manual segmentation, median dice (25th and 75th percentiles)): 0.69(0.42-0.81). There was no significant difference in the scar size between TPM and 5-SD. However, both 5-SD and TPM yielded larger scar sizes compared with FWHM (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002). There were strong correlations between scar size measured by TPM, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, r = -0.76, p < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.73, p < 0.001), and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (r = 0.75, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The TPM method is comparable with current SI-based methods, both for the scar size assessment and the relationship with left ventricular remodeling when applied on LGE-CMRI.
