Hyperfine Coupling Constants in Local Exact Two-Component Theory
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Yannick J Franzke1, Jason M Yu2
1Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße 4, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Abstract:
We present a highly efficient implementation of the electron-nucleus hyperfine coupling matrix within the one-electron exact two-component (X2C) theory. The complete derivative of the X2C Hamiltonian is formed, that is, the derivatives of the unitary decoupling transformation are considered. This requires the solution of the response and Sylvester equations, consequently increasing the computational costs. Therefore, we apply the diagonal local approximation to the unitary decoupling transformation (DLU). The finite nucleus model is employed for both the scalar potential and the vector potential. Two-electron picture-change effects are modeled with the (modified) screened nuclear spin-orbit approach. Our implementation is fully integral direct and OpenMP-parallelized. An extensive benchmark study regarding the Hamiltonian, the basis set, and the density functional approximation is carried out for a set of 12-17 transition-metal compounds. The error introduced by DLU is negligible, and the DLU-X2C Hamiltonian accurately reproduces its four-component "fully" relativistic parent results. Functionals with a large amount of Hartree-Fock exchange such as CAM-QTP-02 and ωB97X-D are generally favorable. The pure density functional r2SCAN performs remarkably and even outperforms the common hybrid functionals TPSSh and CAM-B3LYP. Fully uncontracted basis sets or contracted quadruple-ζ bases are required for accurate results. The capability of our implementation is demonstrated for [Pt(C6Cl5)4]- with more than 4700 primitive basis functions and four rare-earth single-molecule magnets: [La(OAr*)3]-, [Lu(NR2)3]-, [Lu(OAr*)3]-, and [TbPc2]-. Here, the results with the spin-orbit DLU-X2C Hamiltonian are in an excellent agreement with the experimental findings of all Pt, La, Lu, and Tb molecules.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...

