Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
Dynamic risk factors reassessed regularly after release from incarceration predict imminent violent recidivism
Ariel G Stone1, Caleb D Lloyd1, Ralph C Serin2
1Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare.
Reassessing dynamic risk factors, particularly acute ones, improves predictions of violent recidivism in paroled individuals. Consistent patterns of hostility and reactivity are better indicators than isolated incidents for predicting future violence.
Area of Science:
- Criminology
- Forensic Psychology
- Corrections
Background:
- Reassessing dynamic risk factors enhances recidivism prediction in community corrections.
- Evidence for predicting violent recidivism specifically through reassessments is less established.
- This study investigates the impact of reassessment proximity and aggregation on predicting imminent violence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if reassessment of dynamic risk factors improves the prediction of violent recidivism compared to initial assessments.
- To explore whether the aggregation or proximity of reassessments enhances the prediction of imminent violence.
- To identify specific risk factor domains that best predict violent recidivism.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study was conducted on individuals under community supervision in New Zealand.
- Data included 75,917 assessments from 3,421 participants, primarily men.
- Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-entry (DRAOR) ratings and static risk scores were used to predict violence within two weeks.
Main Results:
- Violent recidivism was associated with higher initial risk ratings and greater week-to-week fluctuations in DRAOR scores.
- Aggregated scores of acute, faster-changing risk factors demonstrated the best predictive accuracy (c-index = 0.68).
- Changes in these acute risk factors incrementally improved predictions beyond criminal history and initial scores.
Conclusions:
- Consistent patterns of interpersonal hostility and reactivity, as aggregated over time, are more predictive of imminent violence than current presentations.
- Supervision officers should focus on overall risk factor trends rather than assuming isolated incidents signal immediate danger.
- Findings align with social cognition theories explaining violent behavior.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Regression Toward the Mean
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Attachment Styles

