Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions01:19

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

22
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
22
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

63.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
63.5K
Need for Self-Esteem01:27

Need for Self-Esteem

18
The human need for self-esteem has long intrigued psychologists, leading to the development of several theories that explore its evolutionary and functional significance. Among the most influential are the sociometer, hierometer, and terror management theories. Each offers a unique perspective on why people strive for self-worth and how it shapes behavior and social interaction.Sociometer TheoryAccording to sociometer theory, self-esteem functions as an internal gauge of social acceptance. It...
18
Magical Thinking01:29

Magical Thinking

8
Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
8
Functionalism01:11

Functionalism

1.7K
William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce were instrumental in founding functional psychology, which draws heavily from Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. This theory suggests that individual traits, including behaviors, are adapted to their environments through natural selection. At the heart of functionalism is the concept of adaptation, meaning that a trait enhances an individual's chances of survival and reproduction.
James envisioned psychology's...
1.7K
Structuralism01:26

Structuralism

2.3K
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine understanding.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Judgments of Responsibility for Inequality: A Framework and Review.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

How beliefs persist amid controversy: The paths to persistence model.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

How laypeople evaluate scientific explanations containing jargon.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Evidence for multiple kinds of belief in theory of mind.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Is Ockham's razor losing its edge? New perspectives on the principle of model parsimony.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K

Explaining the existential: Scientific and religious explanations play different functional roles.

Telli Davoodi1, Tania Lombrozo1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|December 20, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific explanations are favored for their logic and evidence, while religious explanations are valued for social and emotional benefits. This research explores the distinct psychological roles of science and religion in answering existential questions.

More Related Videos

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology of Religion
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • Existential questions, such as the origin of the universe and the afterlife, are addressed by both scientific and religious explanations.
  • Understanding the psychological roles and perceived merits of these different explanation domains is crucial for cognitive and social sciences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether scientific and religious explanations are perceived to have distinct epistemic (e.g., evidential, logical) versus nonepistemic (e.g., social, emotional, moral) merits.
  • To examine how the endorsement of scientific versus religious explanations relates to their perceived merits.
  • To determine whether prompting for specific types of merits influences the generation of scientific or religious explanations.

Main Methods:

  • Three studies involving 1,647 participants were conducted.
  • Participants evaluated scientific and religious explanations based on epistemic and nonepistemic merits.
  • Experimental manipulations assessed the influence of prompting for epistemic or nonepistemic merits on explanation generation.

Main Results:

  • Scientific explanations were consistently attributed higher epistemic merits (evidential, logical support) compared to religious explanations.
  • Religious explanations were attributed higher nonepistemic merits (social, emotional, moral benefits) compared to scientific explanations.
  • Participants were more likely to generate scientific explanations when prompted for epistemic merits and religious explanations when prompted for nonepistemic merits.

Conclusions:

  • The findings highlight the differential psychological roles of scientific and religious explanations.
  • Perceived epistemic merits strongly predict endorsement of scientific explanations, while nonepistemic merits predict endorsement of religious explanations.
  • This research offers insights into the coexistence of scientific and religious cognition and their distinct contributions to human understanding.