Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.1K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.1K
Point and Frameshift Mutations01:30

Point and Frameshift Mutations

244
Point mutations are genetic alterations involving the change of a single nucleotide base pair in DNA. Depending on how the alteration affects protein synthesis, they can lead to various consequences.Point mutations fall into the following types:Silent mutations occur when a nucleotide change does not alter the amino acid sequence due to the redundancy of the genetic code. For instance, changing ACC to ACA still encodes threonine, leaving the protein function unaffected. This occurs because...
244
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.6K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.6K
Genetic Variation01:25

Genetic Variation

847
Genetic variation is the diversity in DNA sequences found among individuals of the same species. This diversity is crucial for a species' survival because it helps organisms adapt to environmental changes. Genetic variation begins with fertilization, where an egg and sperm cell merge. Each of these cells carries 23 chromosomes, up to 46 in the fertilized egg. Chromosomes are long DNA strands that contain genes, the basic units of heredity.
Genes exist in different versions called alleles,...
847
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs01:05

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

16.7K
A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
16.7K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

5.3K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
Same author

Evolutionary dynamics of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic periods in Houston, Texas, USA.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Two Australian genome assemblies expand the genomic blueprint of giant kelp.

BMC genomics·2026
Same author

Evaluating large language models for automated REDCap support ticket triage and response.

JAMIA open·2026
Same author

Structural variant calling using Sniffles2.

Nature protocols·2026
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein's Structural Dynamics Affect the Activity of the Bebtelovimab Antibody.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Somatic mobility of transposons is explosive and shaped by distinct integration biases in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

UK Biobank whole-genome sequencing reveals robust contributions of rare variants to complex-trait heritability.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

A one-week automated genome-wide optical pooled screen using OttoSeq.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic profiling of the host response in human malaria.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Centromeric satellite expansion drives genome evolution in the snowy owl.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Mapping the landscape of allele-specific expression in porcine genomes.

Genome biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.1K

Hidden biases in germline structural variant detection.

Michael M Khayat1,2, Sayed Mohammad Ebrahim Sahraeian3, Samantha Zarate4

  • 1Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Genome Biology
|December 21, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Identifying genomic structural variations (SV) using next-generation sequencing is challenging. This study reveals mapping methods contribute most to SV calling variability, impacting large cohort analysis.

Keywords:
Genomic variabilityNext-generation sequencingStructural variations

More Related Videos

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

34.1K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.1K
Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

34.1K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Genomic structural variations (SV) significantly influence genotypic and phenotypic traits.
  • Accurate detection of SV from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data presents ongoing challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and identify the primary sources of analytical variability in structural variation (SV) detection using NGS data.
  • To provide recommendations for reducing SV calling variability in large-scale genomic studies.

Main Methods:

  • Sequencing DNA from a Chinese family quartet at three different centers in triplicate.
  • Generating 288 derivative datasets using diverse analysis pipelines for comparison.
  • Analyzing variability contributions from mapping methods, sequencing centers, and replicates.

Main Results:

  • Mapping methods were the largest contributor to SV calling variability, followed by sequencing centers and replicates.
  • SV supported by a single center or replicate showed high overlap with long-read SV call sets, indicating high false negative rates.
  • SV calling variability persists even in genotyping, highlighting the influence of sequencing and preparation methods.

Conclusions:

  • This study offers novel insights into the sources of variability in SV identification from NGS data.
  • Challenges remain in SV calling for large cohorts, necessitating careful consideration of analytical pipelines and alignment methodologies.
  • Recommendations are provided to mitigate SV calling variability and optimize alignment strategies.