Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Retinal Pigment Epithelium Transplantation in a Non-human Primate Model for Degenerative Retinal Diseases
Published on: June 14, 2021
Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review
Mohd-Asyraaf Abdul-Kadir1, Lik Thai Lim2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan, Malaysia. akmasyraaf@unimas.my.
Abstract:
Modern surgical interventions effectively treat macular holes (MHs) more than 90%. Current surgical treatment for MHs is pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, gas endotamponade, and prone posturing postoperatively. However, a small subset of MHs imposes challenges to surgeons and frustrations on patients. A narrative review was performed on the surgical treatment of challenging MHs including large and extra-large MHs, myopic MHs with or without retinal detachment, and chronic and refractory MHs. There are robust data supporting inverted ILM flap as the first-line treatment for large idiopathic MHs and certain secondary MHs including myopic MHs. In addition, several studies had shown that ILM flap manipulations in combination with surgical adjuncts increase surgical success, especially in difficult MHs. Even in eyes with limited ILM, surgical options included autologous retinal graft, human amniotic membrane, and creation of a distal ILM flap that can assist in MH closure even though the functional outcome may be affected by the MH chronicity. Despite relative success anatomically and visually after each technique, most techniques require a long-term study to analyze their safety profile and to establish any morphological changes of the MH plug in the closed MHs.
Insights
Surgical outcomes for macular holes (MHs) are generally high. Challenging MH cases, including large or myopic MHs, benefit from techniques like the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Surgery
Background:
- Macular holes (MHs) are effectively treated by modern surgery in over 90% of cases.
- Standard treatment involves pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and gas tamponade.
- A subset of MHs presents surgical challenges, impacting patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review surgical treatments for challenging macular holes.
- To evaluate techniques for large, myopic, chronic, and refractory MHs.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of surgical strategies for difficult MH cases.
- Analysis of inverted ILM flap, ILM flap manipulations, and adjuncts.
- Consideration of alternative grafts (autologous retinal graft, amniotic membrane) for limited ILM cases.
Main Results:
- Inverted ILM flap is a primary treatment for large idiopathic and some secondary MHs, including myopic MHs.
- ILM flap techniques combined with adjuncts improve success rates in complex MHs.
- Alternative grafts can aid MH closure in limited ILM scenarios, though functional outcomes may vary with chronicity.
Conclusions:
- Advanced surgical techniques, particularly ILM flap variations, offer solutions for challenging MHs.
- Further long-term studies are needed to assess the safety and morphological changes of MH closure techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Glaucoma: Overview

