Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Clinical evaluation of implant overdentures fabricated using 3D-printing technology versus conventional fabrication
Aim:
To evaluate the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients rehabilitated with conventional or 3D-printed implant overdentures.
Materials And Methods:
A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed. Twenty-eight completely edentulous participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. All participants received two implants with ball attachments. Participants in the control group were rehabilitated with conventionally manufactured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) maxillary complete dentures (CDs) and mandibular implant overdentures, while those in the intervention group received digital light processing (DLP)-printed photopolymerizable PMMA maxillary CDs (NextDent) and mandibular implant overdentures. Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months where Oral Health Impact Profile 19 (OHIPEDENT19) data were used to assess the OHRQoL of the participants. Denture retention was measured using a digital force gauge device.
Results:
The OHRQoL values were significantly higher (less improvement) in the conventional overdenture group at 6 months (P = 0.02) and 12 months (P = 0.04). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean retention values of the conventional and 3D-printed overdenture groups. For all the follow-up periods, the mean retention values were higher for the 3D-printed overdenture group (P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
3D-printed overdentures may represent an alternative to conventionally fabricated ones. This study represents a stepping stone and proof of concept that support the potential future use of 3D-printed dentures.
