Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Comparison of LACE and HOSPITAL Readmission Risk Scores for CMS Target and Nontarget Conditions
Stephen L Jones1,2,3, Ohbet Cheon1,4, Joanna-Grace Mayo Manzano5
1Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX.
The LACE index and HOSPITAL score effectively predict patient readmission risks. While LACE showed slightly better overall performance, HOSPITAL excelled in specific cancer and CMS diagnoses, highlighting diagnosis-based variations in predictive accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Informatics
- Predictive Analytics in Healthcare
Background:
- Accurate prediction of hospital readmissions is crucial for optimizing patient care and resource allocation.
- Existing risk prediction models like the LACE index and HOSPITAL score require evaluation across diverse patient populations and diagnostic groups.
- Understanding model performance variations based on specific diagnoses is essential for refining readmission risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility and performance of the LACE index and HOSPITAL score in predicting 30-day readmission risks.
- To assess the accuracy of these models considering specific diagnostic categories, including CMS target diagnoses and cancer cohorts.
- To compare the predictive capabilities of the LACE index and HOSPITAL score in large academic medical center patient cohorts.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 291,886 patient encounters from two academic medical centers (2011-2015).
- Data sourced from the Vizient Clinical Data Base and a regional health information exchange.
- Model performance assessed using Bayesian information criterion and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in overall, CMS diagnosis-based, and cancer diagnosis-based cohorts.
Main Results:
- Both LACE index and HOSPITAL score demonstrated good overall performance in predicting readmission risk.
- The LACE index exhibited slightly superior overall predictive accuracy (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.69, P ≤ 0.001).
- HOSPITAL score consistently outperformed the LACE index for four CMS target diagnoses, lung cancer, and colon cancer cohorts.
- Model performance varied significantly based on salient, diagnosis-specific risk factors.
Conclusions:
- Both LACE index and HOSPITAL score are valuable tools for predicting readmission risks in academic medical center populations.
- The choice of prediction model may depend on the specific patient cohort and diagnostic profile.
- Further research is warranted to refine these models for diagnosis-specific risk stratification to improve patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot